[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

[Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>]

Hi,

On 08/04/2015 17:37, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2015-04-08, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>>>> Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>>
>> checpatch reports some issues by patch 2/2. Can you please fix them and
>> resubmit ? Thanks !
> 
> Applying the patch below corrects most of the issues, but not all of the
> reported issues:
> 
> Cleaned 2 patches
> 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks for
> 0001-ARM-mx5-move-to-a-standard-arch-board-approach.patch:
> warning: arch/arm/Kconfig,440: please write a paragraph that describes
> the config symbol fully
> 

This is not an issue. Patch 1/1 can be applied without changes.

> 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks for
> 0002-ARM-mx5-add-support-for-USB-armory-board.patch:
> check: board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c,382: Alignment should
> match open parenthesis
> warning: include/configs/usbarmory.h,41: line over 80 characters
> 

Both of them must be fixed.

> checkpatch.pl found 0 error(s), 2 warning(s), 1 checks(s)
> 
> diff --git a/board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c b/board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c
> index 3e60a86..573d586 100644
> --- a/board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c
> +++ b/board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c
> @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static void setup_iomux_sd(void)
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD, SD_CMD_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_CLK__ESDHC1_CLK, MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA0__ESDHC1_DAT0,
> -			MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA1__ESDHC1_DAT1,
> -			MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA2__ESDHC1_DAT2,
> -			MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA3__ESDHC1_DAT3,
> -			MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_SDHC_PAD_CTRL),
>  		MX53_PAD_EIM_DA13__GPIO3_13,
>  	};
>  
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void setup_iomux_led(void)
>  {
>  	static const iomux_v3_cfg_t pads[] = {
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_DISP0_DAT6__GPIO4_27,
> -			PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_DOWN),
> +			     PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_DOWN),
>  	};
>  
>  	imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(pads, ARRAY_SIZE(pads));
> @@ -107,9 +107,9 @@ static void setup_iomux_pinheader(void)
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_CSI0_DAT8__GPIO5_26, PAD_CTRL_UP),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_CSI0_DAT9__GPIO5_27, PAD_CTRL_UP),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_CSI0_DAT10__UART1_TXD_MUX,
> -			MX53_UART_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_UART_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_CSI0_DAT11__UART1_RXD_MUX,
> -			MX53_UART_PAD_CTRL),
> +			     MX53_UART_PAD_CTRL),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_CSI0_DAT12__GPIO5_30, PAD_CTRL_UP),
>  	};
>  
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static void setup_iomux_pinheader(void)
>  static void setup_iomux_unused_boot(void)
>  {
>  	static const iomux_v3_cfg_t pads[] = {
> -
>  		/* Pulled-up pads */
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_EIM_A21__GPIO2_17, PAD_CTRL_UP),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_EIM_DA0__GPIO3_0, PAD_CTRL_UP),
> @@ -155,7 +154,6 @@ static void setup_iomux_unused_nc(void)
>  	   ROM is executed so we force all the not connected pins
>  	   to a known state */
>  	static const iomux_v3_cfg_t pads[] = {
> -
>  		/* CONTROL PINS block */
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_GPIO_0__GPIO1_0, PAD_CTRL_UP),
>  		NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_GPIO_1__GPIO1_1, PAD_CTRL_UP),
> 
> 

Ok, but I need that the patch is sent again (no following up patch) with
git send-email to avoid issues with the mailer.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================