[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 00/14] Add PSCI support for Jetson TK1/Tegra124 + CNTFRQ fix

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>]

On 2015-04-10 11:54, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 09:07:13AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2015-04-10 08:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:37:40AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2015-03-19 16:02, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:10AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>>>  - rebased over master
>>>>>>  - implemented psci_get_cpu_id as weak function
>>>>>>  - implemented psci_disable/enable_smp as weak functions
>>>>>>  - adjusted register interface of psci_get_cpu_stack_top
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This version (+ the non-cached memory init fix) can also be found at
>>>>>> https://github.com/siemens/u-boot/tree/jetson-tk1-v5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
>>>>>> CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ian Campbell (3):
>>>>>>   tegra124: Add more registers to struct mc_ctlr
>>>>>>   jetson-tk1: Add PSCI configuration options and reserve secure code
>>>>>>   tegra124: Reserve secure RAM using MC_SECURITY_CFG{0, 1}_0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan Kiszka (11):
>>>>>>   sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init
>>>>>>   ARM: Factor out common psci_get_cpu_id
>>>>>>   ARM: Factor out reusable psci_cpu_off_common
>>>>>>   ARM: Factor out reusable psci_cpu_entry
>>>>>>   ARM: Factor out reusable psci_get_cpu_stack_top
>>>>>>   ARM: Put target PC for PSCI CPU_ON on per-CPU stack
>>>>>>   virt-dt: Allow reservation of secure region when in a RAM carveout
>>>>>>   tegra: Make tegra_powergate_power_on public
>>>>>>   tegra: Add ap_pm_init hook
>>>>>>   tegra124: Add PSCI support for Tegra124
>>>>>>   tegra: Set CNTFRQ for secondary CPUs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S                   | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S             | 112 ++++---------------------
>>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c                |  29 +++++++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c                |   5 ++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra/ap.h        |   5 ++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra/powergate.h |   1 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra124/flow.h   |   6 ++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra124/mc.h     |  35 +++++++-
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h                |   1 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/system.h               |   1 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/lib/bootm-fdt.c                    |   5 ++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile                |   4 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/ap.c                    |  15 ++++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/powergate.c             |   2 +-
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/psci.S                  | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/Kconfig        |   2 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/Makefile       |   4 +
>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/ap.c           |  55 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>  board/nvidia/common/board.c                 |   4 +
>>>>>>  include/configs/jetson-tk1.h                |   5 ++
>>>>>>  20 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-tegra/psci.S
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/ap.c
>>>>>
>>>>> For the series:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for all feedback - what's next? Anything missing? Should I rebase
>>>> (didn't check yet if that is necessary) and resend?
>>>
>>> One of the things that I'm unsure about is that we need a couple of
>>> patches in the kernel to keep systems working with these U-Boot patches
>>> applied. The cpuidle driver needs to be disabled if PSCI is enabled (I
>>> have a patch to do that). And there are a couple of other things that
>>> U-Boot needs to do before switching to non-secure mode (enabling the
>>> SMMU because that can't be done in non-secure mode).
>>>
>>> So unconditionally enabling this is going to cause breakage in current
>>> kernels. Perhaps a solution would be to get all the code in place but
>>> not update the configuration just yet.
>>
>> Isn't there ARMV7_VIRT, "Enable support for hardware virtualization", to
>> control this already?
> 
> Well yeah, but I think that currently gets enabled by default.

No problem, will flip the default. I'll also finally give your SMMU
patch a try, provided I find a proper test case Linux-wise.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux