public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 256
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:01:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552B85DA.2090503@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201504131042.02552.marex@denx.de>

Hello Marek, Joerg,

Am 13.04.2015 10:42, schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 10:39:46 AM, J?rg Krause wrote:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On So, 2015-04-12 at 10:17 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> On the i.mx6 based aristainetos2 board a Toshiba TH58NYG3S0HBAI4
>>> is used, which has 4096 pagesize and 256b oob. The ECC strength
>>> was not correct detected by U-Boot
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>   drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>>> index 2d2b938..00bf036 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ static inline uint32_t
>>> mxs_nand_get_ecc_strength(uint32_t page_data_size,
>>>
>>>                if (page_oob_size == 224)
>>>
>>>                        return 16;
>>>
>>> +
>>> +             if (page_oob_size == 256)
>>> +                     return 18;
>>>
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        return 0;
>>
>> How about calculation the ECC strength dynamically? Peng Fan from
>> Freescale send a patch doing this in December 2014 which was already
>> reviewed by Marek:
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/422756/
>>
>> It is also necessary to change the calculation in mxsboot...
>
> Would be nice if the patch got applied, but I think there were some
> comments and the patch was never fixed/reposted. If Heiko wants to
> do it, that'd be nice.

Hmm.. I feel, I have not much time left for fixing such things...

Joerg: You wrote on Jan. 27, 2015, 11:14 p.m.:
"I was able to fix mxsboot, but I had difficulties with round_down, which
is a macro definition in linux/kernel.h. I've copied the macro
definition to mxsboot. I will submit the patch in a seperate mail."

Did you post such a patch? Was this the onyl problem of the patch
from Peng Fan?

"I would like to see a comment or a macro for the magic number 13, which
is the value for the Galois Field, just for clarification"

I have no idea what 13 means ...

> Nice domain name btw ;-)

Indeed.

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-13  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-12  8:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 256 Heiko Schocher
2015-04-13  8:39 ` Jörg Krause
2015-04-13  8:42   ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-13  9:01     ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2015-04-13  9:12       ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-13 11:38       ` Jörg Krause
2015-04-13 13:25         ` Heiko Schocher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552B85DA.2090503@denx.de \
    --to=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox