From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolay Dimitrov Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:22:09 +0300 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: mx6: Clamp MMDC and DDR3 clocks for timing calculations In-Reply-To: <5537901B.8050106@denx.de> References: <1429223817-10076-1-git-send-email-picmaster@mail.bg> <5537901B.8050106@denx.de> Message-ID: <55379271.10501@mail.bg> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stefano, On 04/22/2015 03:12 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Nikolay, > > On 17/04/2015 00:36, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> This is proposal for clamping the MMDC/DDR3 clocks to the maximum supported >> frequencies as per imx6 SOC models, and for dynamically calculating valid >> clock value based on mem_speed. >> >> Currently the code uses impossible values for mem_speed (1333, 1600 MT/s) for >> calculating the DDR timings, and uses fixed clock (528 or 400 MHz) which >> doesn't take into account DDR3 memory limitations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Dimitrov >> Cc: Fabio Estevam >> Cc: Stefano Babic >> Cc: Tim Harvey >> Cc: Eric Nelson >> --- >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c >> index fef2231..9daa180 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ void mx6_dram_cfg(const struct mx6_ddr_sysinfo *sysinfo, >> u16 tdllk = 0x1ff; /* DLL locking time: 512 cycles (JEDEC DDR3) */ >> u8 coladdr; >> int clkper; /* clock period in picoseconds */ >> - int clock; /* clock freq in mHz */ >> + int clock; /* clock freq in MHz */ >> int cs; >> >> mmdc0 = (struct mmdc_p_regs *)MMDC_P0_BASE_ADDR; >> @@ -273,16 +273,31 @@ void mx6_dram_cfg(const struct mx6_ddr_sysinfo *sysinfo, >> mmdc1 = (struct mmdc_p_regs *)MMDC_P1_BASE_ADDR; >> #endif >> >> - /* MX6D/MX6Q: 1066 MHz memory clock, clkper = 1.894ns = 1894ps */ >> + /* Limit mem_speed for MX6D/MX6Q */ >> if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) { >> - clock = 528; >> + if (ddr3_cfg->mem_speed > 1066) >> + ddr3_cfg->mem_speed = 1066; /* 1066 MT/s */ >> + >> tcwl = 4; >> } >> - /* MX6S/MX6DL: 800 MHz memory clock, clkper = 2.5ns = 2500ps */ >> + /* Limit mem_speed for MX6S/MX6DL */ >> else { >> - clock = 400; >> + if (ddr3_cfg->mem_speed > 800) >> + ddr3_cfg->mem_speed = 800; /* 800 MT/s */ >> + >> tcwl = 3; >> } >> + >> + clock = ddr3_cfg->mem_speed / 2; >> + /* >> + * Data rate of 1066 MT/s requires 533 MHz DDR3 clock, but MX6D/Q supports >> + * up to 528 MHz, so reduce the clock to fit chip specs >> + */ >> + if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) { >> + if (clock > 528) >> + clock = 528; /* 528 MHz */ >> + } >> + >> clkper = (1000 * 1000) / clock; /* pico seconds */ >> todtlon = tcwl; >> taxpd = tcwl; >> > > Well done. I think we can forget the RFC of the title and apply it. Do you need me to reword the commit message? Regards, Nikolay