[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] powerpc/t1023rdb: Add T1023 RDB board support

[York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>]

Resend with corrected email address.

+Masahiro Yamada

On 04/23/2015 01:27 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sun York-R58495
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 3:22 AM
>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/t1023rdb: Add T1023 RDB board support
>>
>> On 03/27/2015 12:48 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>>> T1023RDB is a Freescale Reference Design Board that hosts the T1023 SoC.
>>>
>>> +++ b/configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>>> +CONFIG_SPL=y
>>> +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="PPC_T1023,T1023RDB,RAMBOOT_PBL,SPL_FSL_PBL,NAND"
>>> ++S:CONFIG_PPC=y
>>> ++S:CONFIG_MPC85xx=y
>>> ++S:CONFIG_TARGET_T102XRDB=y
>>
>> Please do not use CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS for new boards.
>>
>> York
> 
> I noted "config SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS string "Extra Options (DEPRECATED)" in Kconfig.
> But we still have to use the CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS in current configuration 
> Infrastructure, unless a newer approach is available in future.
> 
> Because there are some something like 'SPL_FSL_PBL', 'NAND', 'SPIFLASH''SDCARD' which must be 
> defined dynamically during build u-boot for various boot-mode in those *_defconfig files 
> instead of in static include/config.h

I was thinking to use "select" in Kconfig. But as you said, there are some
macros not standardized. Maybe it is too early to enforce that. Let's hear from
Masahiro Yamada.

York