From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:18:48 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] avr32: remove non-generic boards In-Reply-To: <20150511113231.GC16123@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <1431342449-26635-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com> <20150511111949.GA3773@samfundet.no> <5550929F.8000800@gmail.com> <20150511113231.GC16123@waldemar-brodkorb.de> Message-ID: <5552FAD8.4060800@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Waldemar, On 05/11/2015 01:32 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi, > Andreas Bie?mann wrote, > >> Hi Hans-Christian, >> >> On 05/11/2015 01:19 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >>> Around Mon 11 May 2015 13:07:22 +0200 or thereabout, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: >>>> Andreas Bie?mann (7): >>>> avr32: delete non generic board atngw100 >>>> avr32: delete non generic board favr-32-ezkit >>>> avr32: delete non generic board hammerhead >>>> avr32: delete non generic board mimc200 >>>> avr32: delete non generic board's atstk100{3,4,6} >>>> avr32: take maintainership for atstk1002 >>>> avr32: delete ancient board.c >>> >>> If one were to prioritize, then keeping the atngw100 board would be great. >> >> +1, but as said above, I want a run-time test and can't do it for my own. >> Waldemar talked to me lately to get his ngw100 up running current u-boot >> (2015.01 I think). So Waldemar, could you please do a runtime test for >> atngw100 and required adoptions? Or anyone else? > > I can try a runtime test tommorow. any progress? Could you run the test and was it (un)successful? Andreas