[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 RESEND] nand: fix buffer alignment in new verification feature

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 05/06/2015 09:54 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Am 06.05.2015 18:01, schrieb Stephen Warren:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> On systems with caches enabled, NAND I/O may need to flush/invalidate
>> the cache during read/write operations. For this to work correctly, all
>> buffers must be cache-aligned. Fix nand_verify*() to allocate aligned
>> buffers.
>>
>> This prevents cache alignment warnings from being spewed when using
>> U-Boot to write an updated version of itself to flash on NVIDIA Tegra
>> Seaboard (after perturbation of stack/data layout in current
>> u-boot-dm/next branch).
>>
>> I have validatd (executed) nand_verify(), but I don't think I've executed
>> nand_verify_page_oob(); testing of that would be useful.

Is there any chance of this being applied? It's been 5 weeks since it 
was first sent.

>> Cc: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> Fixes: 59b5a2ad83df ("nand: Add verification functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>> Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> Resending to Tom for direct application, including reviewed-/acked-by
>> tags
>> from others.
>>
>> As an aside, I think this patch demonstrates why new features
>> shouldn't be
>> merged just a couple weeks before the release; there's not enough time to
>> detect regressions and patch them. The merge window is for new features.
>
> Yes, with new features we should be more conservative.
>
>> v2: Use memalign() rather than ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER() so that the
>> buffer is allocated from the heap not on the stack, to reduce stack
>> usage.
>>
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for detecting this.
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>
> bye,
> Heiko
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
>> index 12dd26a33fac..ee2c24df3b85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ int nand_verify_page_oob(nand_info_t *nand, struct
>> mtd_oob_ops *ops, loff_t ofs)
>>
>>       memcpy(&vops, ops, sizeof(vops));
>>
>> -    vops.datbuf = malloc(verlen);
>> +    vops.datbuf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, verlen);
>>
>>       if (!vops.datbuf)
>>           return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ int nand_verify(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t ofs,
>> size_t len, u_char *buf)
>>       int rval = 0;
>>       size_t verofs;
>>       size_t verlen = nand->writesize;
>> -    uint8_t *verbuf = malloc(verlen);
>> +    uint8_t *verbuf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, verlen);
>>
>>       if (!verbuf)
>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>
>