From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:27:27 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/20] armv8/ls2085a: call ft_pcie_setup() to
 change dts status
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0301MB06709B928DDCAC9F52B86E0AA9CB0@DM2PR0301MB0670.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1431932937-10120-1-git-send-email-prabhakar@freescale.com>
 <1431932937-10120-5-git-send-email-prabhakar@freescale.com>
 <5564971C.9080906@freescale.com>
 <DM2PR0301MB06401C2E8E4C31F96E46D55CE2CB0@DM2PR0301MB0640.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <DM2PR0301MB06709B928DDCAC9F52B86E0AA9CB0@DM2PR0301MB0670.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <5565E25F.3040908@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de



On 05/26/2015 09:30 PM, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote:
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this function be called from SoC function? It is not a
>>> board- dependent setup, but rather depending on RCW which is an SoC
>> feature.
>>>
> 
> There are 2 function and their relationship is like this
> ft_pci_setup calling ft_pcie_ls_setup.
> 
> ft_pcie_ls_setup  is doing thing related to SoC.   
> So I believe ft_pci_setup can be called from board file.  Not sure
> 

I was thinking to move the call to fdt.c for the SoC, for example in the
function of ft_cpu_setup().

York