[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARMv7: Factor out reusable timer_wait from sunxi/psci_sun7i.S

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 05-06-15 17:11, York Sun wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2015 02:39 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Dongsheng
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede at redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:35 PM
>>> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Sun York-R58495
>>> Cc: ijc at hellion.org.uk; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; jan.kiszka at siemens.com; Jin
>>> Zhengxiong-R64188; Wang Huan-B18965; Zhao Chenhui-B35336; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARMv7: Factor out reusable timer_wait from
>>> sunxi/psci_sun7i.S
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 05-06-15 10:41, Wang Dongsheng wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede at redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:15 PM
>>>>> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Sun York-R58495
>>>>> Cc: ijc at hellion.org.uk; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net;
>>>>> jan.kiszka at siemens.com; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Wang Huan-B18965; Zhao
>>>>> Chenhui-B35336; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARMv7: Factor out reusable timer_wait from
>>>>> sunxi/psci_sun7i.S
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04-06-15 06:01, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
>>>>>> From: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> timer_wait is moved from sunxi/psci_sun7i.S, and it can be converted
>>>>>> completely into a reusable armv7 generic timer. LS1021A will use it
>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for rebasing this, looks good:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> As for upstreaming this, it is probably best for the entire set to go
>>>>> upstream through the same tree, although if people want I can
>>>>> upstream this one through the sunxi tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the mean time I'll add this to the sunxi-wip branch of my personal
>>>>> repo so that it sees some testing (not that I'm expecting any issues).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your review.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I'm confused in your comments.
>>>> I based on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, master branch. Need I change the tree?
>>> Or ?
>>>
>>> No everything is fine.
>>>
>>> What I'm trying to say is that these patches should probably be merged by the
>>> ls102xa maintainer.
>>>
>
> I can take this set into fsl-qoriq.

That is fine with me.

Regards,

Hans