[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: cache: add an empty stub function for invalidate/flush dcache

[Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>]

Hi, Marek

On 6/8/2015 4:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, June 08, 2015 at 04:05:04 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Marek
>>
>> On 6/5/2015 9:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 05, 2015 at 09:47:30 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
>>>> Since some driver like ohci, lcd used dcache functions. But some ARM
>>>> cpu don't implement the invalidate_dcache_range()/flush_dcache_range()
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> To avoid compiling errors this patch adds an weak empty stub function
>>>> for all ARM cpu.
>>>>
>>>> And each cpu can implement its own implementation. If not implemented
>>>> by default it will use an empty function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2: new added
>>>>
>>>>    arch/arm/lib/cache.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>> So, why exactly can't this be entirely common code , but a CPU-specific
>>> code ? :)
>> Do you mean to make those empty functions as common code for all arch
>> cpu to use?
> Yes.
>
>> It seems there is no place to put common code for all arch cpu.
> Isn't that what the common/ directory is for ? ;-)

Oh, yes ;-)

I just think maybe it's more logical to keep those to the 
<arch>/lib/cache.c as cache are <arch> dependent.

Another point is if we create a new cache.c in common/, then the cache 
implementation code are in three files:
    <arch>/cpu/cache.c or cpu.c
    <arch>/lib/cache.c
    common/cache.c

It seems too fragmented. What do you think?

Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut