From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:06:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot-with-spl.bin don't include the dtb image when
 enable CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ0__9_Dtk6ALv89OwfFQbjcVZPA+dw3r-rrF4QwyWacew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BN1PR0301MB0612619D8644BD8FB717094FF89A0@BN1PR0301MB0612.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAPnjgZ0__9_Dtk6ALv89OwfFQbjcVZPA+dw3r-rrF4QwyWacew@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55AB84A9.6080209@redhat.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

On 16-07-15 01:17, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 July 2015 at 02:42, Wang Haikun <Haikun.Wang@freescale.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> It seems that we don't update the source image name to u-boot-dtb.bin in
>> case of enabling CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE when generate u-boot-with-spl.bin file.
>>
>>
>> ifdef CONFIG_TPL
>> SPL_PAYLOAD := tpl/u-boot-with-tpl.bin
>> else
>> SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot.bin
>> endif
>>
>> OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot-with-spl.bin = -I binary -O binary \
>>                                       --pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO)
>> u-boot-with-spl.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin $(SPL_PAYLOAD) FORCE
>>            $(call if_changed,pad_cat)
>>
>
> At least for sunxi this worked for me. But perhaps sunxi is a special
> case?

Yes I believe that sunxi has special code for this since we need to run
an utility to add a header to the spl binary.

Regards,

Hans