From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: cache: add an empty stub function for invalidate/flush dcache
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:06:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B70DE0.5010700@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd7uvgx3vkiflcwy59o01lr0.1438057460365@email.android.com>
Hi, York
On 7/28/2015 12:24 PM, York Sun wrote:
> Please search the same name function in the same file.
yes, there still have flush_dcache_range() & invalidate_dcache_range()
function defined in case of DCACHE is enabled (CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF is
not defined).
And in that case, the empty weak functions flush_dcache_range() &
invalidate_dcache_range() in arch/arm/lib/cache.c will be ignored. It is
an expect behavior.
or did I miss something?
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
> York
>
> Sent from my cellphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Josh Wu
> Date:07/27/2015 19:17 (GMT-08:00)
> To: Sun York-R58495 , U-Boot Mailing List , Marek Vasut , Tom Rini
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Jeroen Hofstee , Valentine Barshak , Simon Glass
> , Thierry Reding , Masahiro Yamada , Heiko Schocher , Albert Aribaud ,
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: cache: add an empty stub function for
> invalidate/flush dcache
>
> Hi, York
>
> On 7/28/2015 12:31 AM, York Sun wrote:
> >
> > On 07/26/2015 08:40 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
> >> Since some driver like ohci, lcd used dcache functions. But some ARM
> >> cpu don't implement the invalidate_dcache_range()/flush_dcache_range()
> >> functions.
> >>
> >> To avoid compiling errors this patch adds an weak empty stub function
> >> for all ARM cpu in arch/arm/lib/cache.c.
> >> And ARM cpu still can implemnt its own cache functions on the cpu
> folder.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - remove the same functions in the cpu/ files as they will use the weak
> >> function provided in lib/cache.c
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - new added.
> >>
> > <snip>
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache_v8.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache_v8.c
> >> index c5ec529..f8c17cc 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache_v8.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache_v8.c
> >> @@ -149,14 +149,6 @@ void flush_dcache_all(void)
> >> {
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void invalidate_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
> >> -{
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -void flush_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
> >> -{
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> void dcache_enable(void)
> >> {
> >> }
> > Are you sure about this change?
>
> This patch deletes those above empty functions so that the driver will
> use the same weak empty functions in arch/arm/lib/cache.c, which is
> added by this patch as well.
>
> > You are probably changing the wrong leg of the
> > #if conditional code.
>
> I don't think so. Could give me more details about this? Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Josh Wu
>
> >
> > York
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 3:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM & m68k: cache: add weak cache code then enable usb cache support Josh Wu
2015-07-27 3:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] m68k: cache: add an empty stub functions for invalidate/flush dcache Josh Wu
2015-08-13 13:20 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2015-07-27 3:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: cache: add an empty stub function " Josh Wu
2015-07-27 16:31 ` York Sun
2015-07-28 2:17 ` Josh Wu
2015-07-28 4:24 ` York Sun
2015-07-28 5:06 ` Josh Wu [this message]
2015-07-28 5:21 ` York Sun
2015-08-04 6:50 ` Josh Wu
2015-08-04 15:30 ` York Sun
2015-08-05 7:32 ` Josh Wu
2015-08-13 13:20 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2015-07-27 3:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: cache: implement a default weak flush_cache() function Josh Wu
2015-08-13 13:20 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2015-07-27 3:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] usb: ohci: enable cache support Josh Wu
2015-08-13 13:20 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,4/4] " Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B70DE0.5010700@atmel.com \
--to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox