From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:54:38 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13][v4] imx: iomux-v3: add imx7d support for iomuxc In-Reply-To: References: <1438295726-2156-1-git-send-email-aalonso@freescale.com> <1438295726-2156-2-git-send-email-aalonso@freescale.com> <55BDE5A2.2050206@denx.de> Message-ID: <55BF102E.5030804@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Fabio, On 02/08/2015 17:48, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > >> I have a main question. For i.MX6, we could factorize (mainly thanks >> Tim's work) the major SOC variants, getting some important goals, as >> having a single u-boot image running on different variations of the same >> board. >> >> This was reached deciding at run time which is the pin, its register and >> the value to be written - instead of fixing at build time. >> >> Exceptions are the SOC that cannot be substitute by another one on the >> same board, because they are not pin compatible: for example, MX&SX. >> >> Now you are introducing the new architecture for MX7, but it looks like >> you get rid of these improvements. It can be right or false, then my >> questions: >> >> - has MX7 quite the same variations as MX6 ? I mean a qaud, dual and >> solo that are pin-to-pin compatible ? > > No, mx7 is not pin compatible with the mx6 family. > Thanks, got it. Regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de =====================================================================