From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:33:02 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6 move TARGET_xx Kconfig option to mx6 specific Kconfig file In-Reply-To: <55C45BFA.5020703@web.de> References: <1438839833-6974-1-git-send-email-Peng.Fan@freescale.com> <55C32A18.4060808@web.de> <20150807011744.GB15528@shlinux2> <55C45BFA.5020703@web.de> Message-ID: <55C45F2E.5050503@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Peng, Soeren, On 07/08/2015 09:19, Soeren Moch wrote: > Peng, > > Sorry for being unclear here. > > In your patch you add several options in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig > under "MX6 board select". Some of these options are named "Support > " (e.g. "Support udoo"), while others are simply called > "" (e.g. "Bachmann OT1200"). > > I would prefer the simple "" naming style for all options and > remove the word "Support" from all description strings. But this is only > my personal opinion and a minor cosmetic change. Checking in other architecture, I see there is no rule about this. Even in the same Kconfig (AT91), there is a mix with and without "Support". Both are ok - decide yourself. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de =====================================================================