[U-Boot] [PATCH 08/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop struct tpm_vendor_specific

[Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>]

Hi Simon,

On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard
> <christophe.ricard@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Locality concept are valid almost on any chip assuming if no locality are
>> supported the default one is locality 0.
>> I would leave this change open for discussion.
>>
>> However, as per patch 06 & 07, i would keep req_complete_mask,
>> req_complete_val, req_canceled, timeout_a, timeout_b, timeout_c, timeout_d
>> in tpm_vendor_specific structure as this is chip specific.
>>
>> I really think tpm_vendor_specific is usefull for managing different kind of
>> TPM "the same way"/following standards.
> That code belongs in the uclass I think. If there really are generic
> settings that are needed for all TPMs then it should sit there. We
> don't want to have an additional layer of stuff that doesn't relate to
> driver model.
After reviewing your previous comments, i think we can drop this 
tpm_vendor_specific structure to simplify the code a bit.
However, the work we are doing may stick only to TPM1.2. I think it will 
be fine as we have only drivers for those kind of TPMs.
I believe a new uclass may be necessary when going to provide support 
TPM 2.0.

In short, may be we can anticipate that and make it explicit in the 
uclass name ? (UCLASS_TPM12 ?)

[...]

Best Regards
Christophe