From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 06/10] fat: ffconf.h changes for U-Boot port
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:01:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D3FF9F.2090801@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150815130711.GY25532@bill-the-cat>
On 08/15/2015 07:07 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:40:48PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/14/2015 12:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:55:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren
>>> wrote:
>>>> Turn on _FS_NORTC: This means we don't have to implement
>>>> get_fattime() which simplifies life for now.
>>>>
>>>> Automatically set _FS_READONLY based on CONFIG_FAT_WRITE.
>>>> This requires including <config.h> since we reference
>>>> CONFIG_*.
>>>>
>>>> Set _USE_LFN to enable long filename handling; an essential
>>>> feature.
>>>>
>>>> Set _FS_RPATH so that paths components "." and ".." are
>>>> correctly parsed and handled. This enables paths such as
>>>> "/extlinux/../foo" to work.
>>>>
>>>> Set _USE_LABEL so that volume labels can be read.
>>>
>>> Hmm, is there some way to wrap volume label support in
>>> Kconfig? I'm sure this is useful in some cases, but maybe
>>> something that boards that are already on the cusp of their
>>> size limit would want off?
>>
>> It's certainly possible; ffconf.h's definition of _FS_READONLY
>> is already driven by CONFIG_FAT_WRITE in this series.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's worth it though; on the RPi, turning off
>> volume label support only saves ~0.5K of .text, 0 .data, and 8
>> bytes .bss. If so, I can certainly throw in another patch to
>> allow it to be configured.
>
> Yeah, OK, that's not a big enough savings to bother with I think.
> On the boards where we're seeing a bigger size growth can you
> investigate a little? Thanks!
I haven't built a lot of boards, but I think that large size increase
may have been limited to sandbox. For some reason, its config.mk
doesn't contain:
PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -ffunction-sections -fvisibility=hidden
If I add that to arch/sandbox/config.mk, then I see a much smaller
size increase when switching to the new FAT implementation.
There are obviously a few functions that aren't used in ff.c, but
aren't ifdef'd out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 14:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 00/10] Replace the FAT filesystem code Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 01/10] disk: support host devices in dev_print() Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 02/10] fat: move to a different directory Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 03/10] fat: add ff.c implementation Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 04/10] fat: apply upstream bugfix to ff.c Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 05/10] fat: ff: add ifdef to avoid unused function warning Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 06/10] fat: ffconf.h changes for U-Boot port Stephen Warren
2015-08-14 18:47 ` Tom Rini
2015-08-15 3:40 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-15 13:07 ` Tom Rini
2015-08-19 4:01 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 07/10] fat: port integer.h to U-Boot types Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/10] fat: add U-Boot to ff.c API conversion wrapper Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 09/10] fat: switch to new FAT implementation Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 10/10] fat: remove old implementation Stephen Warren
2015-08-13 2:56 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 00/10] Replace the FAT filesystem code Simon Glass
2015-08-15 3:36 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-14 19:29 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D3FF9F.2090801@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox