From: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Exynos 5800/5422 CPU ID inconsistency.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:23:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DEE51C.7040605@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440622584.4135.388.camel@collabora.co.uk>
Hello Sjoerd,
On 08/26/2015 10:56 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 06:37 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 26 August 2015 at 06:09, Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The s5p_cpu_id variable is set in here:
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/cpu.h
>>>
>>> For value 0x422, found in pro id register, the s5p_cpu_id is set as
>>> 0x5800.
>>> I think, that hiding the real info is wrong and misleading.
>>>
>>> I don't have documentation for E5800, but maybe there is some
>>> additional
>>> register like package id to recognise the SoC variant.
>>>
>>> I'm pointing this issue, because for older boards, we used this
>>> information
>>> to set the $fdtfile environment variable name, to next load proper
>>> fdt from
>>> partition before boot the kernel.
>>>
>>> Now, I would like use the s5p_cpu_id to set the fdtfile name for
>>> Odroid
>>> XU3/4, but the value is bad.
>>>
>>> I would like fix this value to the real one, but then, the CPU name
>>> will
>>> change on Chromebooks.
>>>
>>> To fix this we could add "cpu-name" property to device tree, and
>>> then print
>>> it.
>
> I was wondering recently whether there shouldn't simply be a device
> -tree property with the name of the fdt file as used by linux such
> there is no need for putting this dynamically together which can be a
> tad error-prone (as this example shows). (Unfortunately not all boards
> in linux use the <cpu name>-<board name> convention :/)
>
>
This could be good for the boards with only one kernel compatible fdt file.
But for Exynos, there can be more than one kernel compatible fdt for a
single U-Boot binary like for Odroid XU3/3L/4 or Odroid U3/X2.
There are also other platforms with this issue, like imx6 wandboard.
Adding common feature for board detection, may be complicated.
After some quick research, I think that adding "cpu-name" to fdt will
look not pretty. Change the name of "cpus" node to the SoC name would be
nice, but will break the compatibility with the kernel and U-Boot's
UCLASS_CPU driver.
In this case, adding a line:
#define CONFIG_CPU_NAME "Exynos5800"
only to the peach-pi.h seem to be reasonable, because for other Exynos
platforms the CPU name is proper.
Best regards,
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marczak at samsung.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 13:09 [U-Boot] Exynos 5800/5422 CPU ID inconsistency Przemyslaw Marczak
2015-08-26 13:37 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-26 20:56 ` Sjoerd Simons
2015-08-27 10:23 ` Przemyslaw Marczak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DEE51C.7040605@samsung.com \
--to=p.marczak@samsung.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox