[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Add support for the Terasic DE-0 Atlas board

[Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>]

On 09/01/2015 03:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 09:38:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Tue 2015-09-01 00:23:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 09:57:05 PM, dinguyen at opensource.altera.com 
> wrote:
>>>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for the Terasic DE0-Nano/Atlas-SoC Kit, which is a CycloneV
>>>> based board. The board can boot from SD/MMC. Ethernet is a bit
>>>> different because it has a KSZ9031 PHY, so for now, ethernet doesn't
>>>> quite work yet, as a few patches are needed to support the PHY.
>>>
>>> I thought we did support the KSZ9031 PHY. What's the problem ?
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>> This patch is based on your u-boot-socfpga/wip/boards branch.
>>>
>>> OK, that makes sense.
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dinh
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                        |   1 +
>>>>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts |  61 +++
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig                |   7 +
>>>>  board/terasic/de0/MAINTAINERS                |   5 +
>>>>  board/terasic/de0/Makefile                   |   9 +
>>>
>>> I think it might be clearer to rename it to de0-nano-soc, what do you
>>> think ? What's the difference between de0-nano-soc and atlas btw ?
>>
>> Unless they are going to make "de0-mega".. I'd say "de0" is clean
>> enough.
> 
> They already make de0-cv , which is cycloneV SoC based, so de0 is not clear
> enough, no way. They also make de0-nano , which is cycloneIV based (without
> soc).
> 

After looking around the site a bit more, I think "de0_nano_sockit" is
more appropriate?

Dinh