[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "fdt: Fix fdtdec_get_addr_size() for 64-bit"

[Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>]

On 09/02/2015 01:39 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Warren
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:05 PM
>> To: Tom Warren; Simon Glass
>> Cc: Bin Meng; Thierry Reding; Tom Rini; U-Boot Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "fdt: Fix fdtdec_get_addr_size() for 64-
>> bit"
>>
>> On 09/02/2015 09:52 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
>>> Simon, et al,
>>>
>>>> Simon Glass wrote at Friday, August 14, 2015 3:05 AM:
>>>> I plan to apply this revert to u-boot-x86 (where SPI is currently
>>>> broken) and (once it has a bit more testing) also this patch which I
>>>> think makes the change in a safer way:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/504918/
>>>>
>>>> At present that patch breaks at least one x86 board and I have not
>>>> dug into it yet.
>>>>
>>>> The revert should not break tegra, according to Stephen.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, my testing on P2571 with TOT u-boot-tegra (rebased against
>> TOT u-boot/master this morning) shows that that is not true.
>>>
>>> The revert of the disputed 'fdtdec_get_addr_size' patch _does_ break Tegra
>> 64-bit (P2571, at least). Nyan-big is OK.  With Simon's revert in place, my board
>> just loops on SPL signon, so I assume it's faulting, etc. in CPU init.  Note that this
>> is the current state of TOT u-boot/master.
>>
>> I'm a bit confused. So far, we don't support SPL on T210 since we assume some
>> other bootloader runs on the boot CPU and starts just the main U-Boot on the
>> main CPU. It sounds like you're testing some local-only SPL support?
>
> Currently there are a couple of ways to get T210 64-bit U-Boot loaded/executed. The first is the way I've always done it (during development and today) - use a 32-bit SPL that I built when I first ported 32-bit U-Boot to T210. I've saved away the SPL portion as a binary, and combine it with the current 64-bit T210 U-Boot proper when building my image.  It's always worked up to now.  What I'm seeing is a failure in the 64-bit CPU U-Boot portion. I just mentioned the looping SPL signon symptom because that's what I see as the indicator of a broken 64-bit image.

Oh I see; the SPL is only looping because the main U-Boot binary
crashes/... and resets the CPU, hence re-executing the SPL. I thought
you were referring to a loop purely within SPL.

Now it makes more sense.

> The other way is to use your proprietary NV bootloader for the 32-bit portion (this will become the de facto standard when we release said NV bootloader code as open-source, or a binary first-stage loader 'tool').  I haven't tried that, since my way works and is an easy part of my workflow.
> 
> If you can point me to your boot CPU loader internally, I can try your method and see if it makes a difference, but I doubt it will.

I sent you an internal email message.

Perhaps you could also try my upstream U-Boot dev branch at:

repo git://github.com/swarren/u-boot.git branch tegra_dev

That has the revert of the original patch in, but also has the following
replacement which you'd want to revert (or perhaps best: try with and
without it):

c1fd5e1d5586 fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions

I'm sure I tested Simon's revert at the time I said it was OK. I wonder
if the revert used to work fine, but something since then fails if the
revert is in place? I would try testing this now, but I'm travelling so
it's a bit more painful.