From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v2] mtd: nand: fsmc: Add BCH4 SW ECC support for SPEAr600
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:56:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F26D07.6060202@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441924298.2909.19.camel@freescale.com>
Hi Scott,
On 11.09.2015 00:31, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 14:29 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> This patch adds support for 4-bit ECC BCH4 for the SPEAr600 SoC. This can
>> be used by boards equipped with a NAND chip that requires 4-bit ECC
>> strength.
>> The SPEAr600 HW ECC only supports 1-bit ECC strength.
>>
>> To enable SW BCH4, you need to specify this in your config header:
>>
>> #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
>> #define CONFIG_BCH
>>
>> And use the command "nandecc bch4" to select this ECC scheme upon runtime.
>>
>> Tested on SPEAr600 x600 board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Removed err = 0 initialization as suggested by Viresh
>> - Completed the commit text
>> - Added Viresh's Acked-by
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/fsmc_nand.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsmc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsmc_nand.c
>> index 567eff0..0976a67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsmc_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsmc_nand.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include <asm/io.h>
>> #include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/nand_bch.h>
>> #include <linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h>
>> #include <linux/mtd/fsmc_nand.h>
>> #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>> @@ -390,6 +391,45 @@ static int fsmc_read_page_hwecc(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> struct nand_chip *chip,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> +/*
>> + * fsmc_nand_switch_ecc - switch the ECC operation between different
>> engines
>> + *
>> + * @eccstrength - the number of bits that could be corrected
>> + * (1 - HW, 4 - SW BCH4)
>> + */
>> +int __maybe_unused fsmc_nand_switch_ecc(uint32_t eccstrength)
>
> What calls this function? You didn't CC me on the rest of the patchset...
> I'm guessing it's a copy-and-paste of what arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c
> does?
Yes.
>> +{
>> + struct nand_chip *nand;
>> + struct mtd_info *mtd;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mtd = &nand_info[nand_curr_device];
>> + nand = mtd->priv;
>> +
>> + /* Setup the ecc configurations again */
>> + if (eccstrength == 1) {
>> + nand->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW;
>> + nand->ecc.bytes = 3;
>> + nand->ecc.strength = 1;
>> + nand->ecc.layout = &fsmc_ecc1_layout;
>> + nand->ecc.correct = nand_correct_data;
>> + } else {
>> + nand->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH;
>> + nand->ecc.calculate = nand_bch_calculate_ecc;
>> + nand->ecc.correct = nand_bch_correct_data;
>> + nand->ecc.bytes = 7;
>> + nand->ecc.strength = 4;
>> + nand->ecc.layout = NULL;
>> + }
>
> nand_scan_tail() should already set .caclulate, .correct, and .bytes for
> NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH.
Yes, thanks for pointing this out.
> When switching from BCH to HW, how does .calculate get set back to
> fsmc_read_hwecc?
Probably not at all. I must have missed testing this.
> What stops this from being called with FSMC_VER8 which appears to have BCH8
> hw ecc?
This function will not be called by any platform that supports FSMC_VER8
- only from SPEArxxx. Which unfortunately only supports 1 bit HW ECC. I
could add a comment to make this clear.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-02 12:29 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v2] mtd: nand: fsmc: Add BCH4 SW ECC support for SPEAr600 Stefan Roese
2015-09-10 22:31 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-11 5:56 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2015-09-11 6:23 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v3] " Stefan Roese
2015-09-11 18:02 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-12 12:50 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 1/4, v2] " Tom Rini
2015-09-12 14:36 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-12 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2015-09-12 14:46 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-12 15:20 ` Tom Rini
2015-09-14 5:30 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F26D07.6060202@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox