From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Przemyslaw Marczak
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:41:02 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_addr_size not to require
any size cells
In-Reply-To: <1443197501-17489-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1443197501-17489-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <5609193E.8050801@samsung.com>
List-Id:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Hello Stephen,
On 09/25/2015 06:11 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> fdtdec_get_addr_size() may be used in two cases:
> a) With sizep supplied, in which case both an address and a size are
> parsed from DT. In this case, the DT property must be large enough to
> contain both values.
> b) With sizep NULL, in which case only an address is parsed from DT.
> In this case, the DT property only need be large enough to contain this
> address value. Commit 02464e386bb5 "fdt: add new fdt address parsing
> functions" broke this relaxed checking, and required the DT property to
> contain both an address and a size value in all cases.
>
> Fix fdtdec_get_addr_size() to vary ns based on whether the size value
> is being parsed from the DT or not. This is safe since the function only
> parses the first entry in the property, so the overall value of (na + ns)
> need not be accurate, since it is never used to step through the property
> data to find other entries. Besides, this fixed behaviour essentially
> matches the original behaviour before the patch this patch fixes. (The
> original code validated that the property was exactly the length of
> either na or (na + ns), whereas the current code only validates that the
> property is at least that long. For non-failure cases, the two behaviours
> are identical).
>
> Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Cc: Thierry Reding
> Cc: Bin Meng
> Cc: Michal Suchanek
> Fixes: 02464e386bb5 ("fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions")
> Reported-by: Przemyslaw Marczak
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
> ---
> lib/fdtdec.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/fdtdec.c b/lib/fdtdec.c
> index 9f0b65de3831..1fdb4f0d9ce9 100644
> --- a/lib/fdtdec.c
> +++ b/lib/fdtdec.c
> @@ -180,10 +180,11 @@ fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent(const void *blob, int node,
> fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr_size(const void *blob, int node,
> const char *prop_name, fdt_size_t *sizep)
> {
> + int ns = sizep ? (sizeof(fdt_size_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t)) : 0;
> +
> return fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(blob, node, prop_name, 0,
> sizeof(fdt_addr_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t),
> - sizeof(fdt_size_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t),
> - sizep);
> + ns, sizep);
> }
>
> fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr(const void *blob, int node,
>
I tested this on top of latest mainline and it fixes the issue for use
of fdtdec_get_addr(), however my fixes should be also applied.
Tested-by: Przemyslaw Marczak
Best regards,
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marczak at samsung.com