From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Przemyslaw Marczak Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:41:02 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_addr_size not to require any size cells In-Reply-To: <1443197501-17489-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1443197501-17489-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <5609193E.8050801@samsung.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Stephen, On 09/25/2015 06:11 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > fdtdec_get_addr_size() may be used in two cases: > a) With sizep supplied, in which case both an address and a size are > parsed from DT. In this case, the DT property must be large enough to > contain both values. > b) With sizep NULL, in which case only an address is parsed from DT. > In this case, the DT property only need be large enough to contain this > address value. Commit 02464e386bb5 "fdt: add new fdt address parsing > functions" broke this relaxed checking, and required the DT property to > contain both an address and a size value in all cases. > > Fix fdtdec_get_addr_size() to vary ns based on whether the size value > is being parsed from the DT or not. This is safe since the function only > parses the first entry in the property, so the overall value of (na + ns) > need not be accurate, since it is never used to step through the property > data to find other entries. Besides, this fixed behaviour essentially > matches the original behaviour before the patch this patch fixes. (The > original code validated that the property was exactly the length of > either na or (na + ns), whereas the current code only validates that the > property is at least that long. For non-failure cases, the two behaviours > are identical). > > Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak > Cc: Simon Glass > Cc: Thierry Reding > Cc: Bin Meng > Cc: Michal Suchanek > Fixes: 02464e386bb5 ("fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions") > Reported-by: Przemyslaw Marczak > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > --- > lib/fdtdec.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/fdtdec.c b/lib/fdtdec.c > index 9f0b65de3831..1fdb4f0d9ce9 100644 > --- a/lib/fdtdec.c > +++ b/lib/fdtdec.c > @@ -180,10 +180,11 @@ fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent(const void *blob, int node, > fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr_size(const void *blob, int node, > const char *prop_name, fdt_size_t *sizep) > { > + int ns = sizep ? (sizeof(fdt_size_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t)) : 0; > + > return fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(blob, node, prop_name, 0, > sizeof(fdt_addr_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t), > - sizeof(fdt_size_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t), > - sizep); > + ns, sizep); > } > > fdt_addr_t fdtdec_get_addr(const void *blob, int node, > I tested this on top of latest mainline and it fixes the issue for use of fdtdec_get_addr(), however my fixes should be also applied. Tested-by: Przemyslaw Marczak Best regards, -- Przemyslaw Marczak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics p.marczak at samsung.com