From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] dm: core: Enable optional use of fdt_translate_address()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:13:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560C0A20.8030909@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443589243-9521-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>
On 09/29/2015 11:00 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> The current "simple" address translation simple_bus_translate() is not
> working on some platforms (e.g. MVEBU). As here more complex "ranges"
> properties are used in many nodes (multiple tuples etc). This patch
> enables the optional use of the common fdt_translate_address() function
> which handles this translation correctly.
This change makes sense to me, but one comment:
> diff --git a/drivers/core/Kconfig b/drivers/core/Kconfig
> +config OF_TRANSLATE
> + bool "Translate addresses using fdt_translate_address"
> + depends on DM && OF_CONTROL
> + default y
So this is on by default, which I think is correct since applying this
technique is required to parse DT correctly. However, ...
> diff --git a/drivers/core/device.c b/drivers/core/device.c
> + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_TRANSLATE)) {
> + /*
> + * Use the full-fledged translate function for complex
> + * bus setups.
> + */
> + return fdt_translate_address((void *)gd->fdt_blob,
> + dev->of_offset, reg);
fdt_translate_address() is a simple wrapper around
__of_translate_address(), and that function calls fdt_parent_offset()
which is "slow" per Simon. Surely this patch will receive the same
objection as when I added a (single) call to fdt_parent_offset() into
the DT address parsing routine (and this patch is worse, since it adds a
call to fdt_parent_offset() for each level of DT sub-nodes).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-02 6:22 [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: core: Enable optional use of fdt_translate_address() Stefan Roese
2015-09-04 3:56 ` Simon Glass
2015-09-04 5:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Stefan Roese
2015-09-09 18:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Simon Glass
2015-09-10 5:54 ` Stefan Roese
2015-09-11 0:42 ` Simon Glass
2015-09-11 5:41 ` Stefan Roese
2015-09-11 17:07 ` Stephen Warren
2015-09-14 5:25 ` Stefan Roese
2015-09-21 18:06 ` Stephen Warren
2015-10-03 12:50 ` Simon Glass
2015-10-03 19:17 ` Stephen Warren
2015-10-04 1:02 ` Simon Glass
2015-10-04 7:35 ` Stefan Roese
2015-10-04 11:38 ` Thomas Chou
2015-10-05 1:22 ` Stephen Warren
2015-10-06 14:17 ` Simon Glass
2015-09-15 7:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Thomas Chou
2015-09-30 5:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Stefan Roese
2015-09-30 16:13 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-10-01 6:59 ` Stefan Roese
2015-10-03 12:53 ` Simon Glass
2015-10-18 23:16 ` Simon Glass
2015-12-03 13:34 ` Bin Meng
2015-12-03 14:12 ` Stefan Roese
2015-12-03 16:59 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-04 5:31 ` Bin Meng
2015-12-04 6:17 ` Bin Meng
2015-12-04 7:52 ` Stefan Roese
2015-12-04 15:01 ` Bin Meng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560C0A20.8030909@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox