From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] imx: hab add mx7 secure boot support
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:52:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617805A.80305@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443648649-24599-4-git-send-email-aalonso@freescale.com>
Hi Adrian,
On 30/09/2015 23:30, Adrian Alonso wrote:
> Add mx7 secure boot support, reuse existing mx6 hab
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes for V2:
> - Split from original patch to track mx7 change set
> hab: rework support for imx6/imx7
>
> arch/arm/imx-common/hab.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/hab.c b/arch/arm/imx-common/hab.c
> index 9ee0f12..565a838 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/hab.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/hab.c
> @@ -261,12 +261,25 @@ uint8_t hab_engines[16] = {
> bool is_hab_enabled(void)
> {
> struct ocotp_regs *ocotp = (struct ocotp_regs *)OCOTP_BASE_ADDR;
> + uint32_t reg;
> +#if CONFIG_MX7
Usage of SOC's runtime detection is vanished by introducing new #ifdef
section. I am aware there some registers defined for a SOC and not for
another. This is the point. We should make the access unaware for the
driver (this file).
hab.c does not yet contain any nasty #ifdef SOC_TYPE - we should have
the same in future.
> + struct fuse_bank *bank = &ocotp->bank[1];
> + struct fuse_bank1_regs *fuse =
> + (struct fuse_bank1_regs *)bank->fuse_regs;
> + reg = readl(&fuse->cfg0);
> +#elif CONFIG_MX6
> struct fuse_bank *bank = &ocotp->bank[0];
> struct fuse_bank0_regs *fuse =
> (struct fuse_bank0_regs *)bank->fuse_regs;
> - uint32_t reg = readl(&fuse->cfg5);
> + reg = readl(&fuse->cfg5);
> +#endif
There are some ways to solve it. For example (but it is not the only
solution), the offset can be set into the corresponding imx_regs as
offsetof(..) and which fuse bank can be picked up from a table here
fuse_bank_choosen = {0 ,1 }
and then
struct fuse_bank *bank;
if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX7))
bank = &ocotp->bank[1];
else
bank = &ocotp->bank[0];
or you find a better solution, of course - but do not introduce new
#ifdef. If you see, hab.c contains at the very beginning a lot of stuff
hab_rvt_report_* that makes runtime detection against compiler switches.
> +
> + if (is_soc_type(MXC_SOC_MX7))
> + return (reg & 0x2000000) == 0x2000000;
> + else if (is_soc_type(MXC_SOC_MX6))
> + return (reg & 0x2) == 0x2;
If I did not know that all i.MXes are little endian, it looks like an
endianess problem. But I suggest to add a macro for a better readiness:
#define IS_HAB_ENABLED_BIT (is_soc_type(MXC_SOC_MX7) ? 0x2000000 : 0x2)
and then you can use here simply:
return (reg & IS_HAB_ENABLED_BIT) == IS_HAB_ENABLED_BIT
> * crash.
> */
> /* Check MMU enabled */
> - if (get_cr() & CR_M) {
> + if (is_soc_type(MXC_SOC_MX6) && get_cr() & CR_M) {
There is a long explanation before this code. As it depends from MMU
only, it does not explain why it is not required for MX7. Please extend
the comment and put a full explanation here.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 21:30 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] imx: cpu: move common chip revision id's Adrian Alonso
2015-09-30 21:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] imx: hab: rework support for imx6/imx7 Adrian Alonso
2015-10-09 8:27 ` Stefano Babic
2015-09-30 21:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] imx: hab use unified rom section for mx6sx and mx6ul Adrian Alonso
2015-10-09 8:25 ` Stefano Babic
2015-09-30 21:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] imx: hab add mx7 secure boot support Adrian Alonso
2015-10-09 8:52 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2015-10-12 18:49 ` Alonso Adrian
2015-09-30 21:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] mx7dsabresd: add " Adrian Alonso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5617805A.80305@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox