From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:02:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562505FD.2060207@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5624D080.9080009@writeme.com>
On 10/19/2015 04:14 AM, Sinan Akman wrote:
>
> Hi Yuan
>
> On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
>> Hi Sinan Akman,
>>
>> Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon.
>> Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon are in user's hands.
>> Because we have also delivery very little board with Rev1.0 silicon to customer or developer for developing, assessing and verifying in the early stages.
>
> Thanks for the follow up on this, but I don't think that there were only
> very few rev1.0 boards delivered. These were the boards bought from
> distributor and during the time span of many weeks.
>
> I don't know the details and the impact of this patch exactly but
> if the patch will break any rev1.0 board I don't think this would be
> acceptable. There are definitely enough number of rev1.0 boards
> made generally available (not specifically for early adapters etc)
> that we should not break u-boot running on them.
>
>> Also we haven't support Rev1.0 in our SDK now.
>
> Sorry, but this is a bit irrelevant here. I'd expect u-boot mainline
> does not necessarily follow what your SDK stops supporting. If
> u-boot supported rev1.0 boards and if there are still many of
> them out there I see no reason to break this.
>
Yuan,
Please test the patch on rev 1.0 SoC and make changes if needed. This feature
has been disabled for rev 1.0.
York
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 7:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot Yuan Yao
2015-10-14 21:21 ` York Sun
2015-10-15 7:55 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-15 16:40 ` York Sun
2015-10-15 19:37 ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19 9:21 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-19 11:14 ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19 15:02 ` York Sun [this message]
2015-10-21 3:59 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-21 5:37 ` York Sun
2015-10-30 16:21 ` York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562505FD.2060207@freescale.com \
--to=yorksun@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox