public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:02:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <562505FD.2060207@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5624D080.9080009@writeme.com>



On 10/19/2015 04:14 AM, Sinan Akman wrote:
> 
>    Hi Yuan
> 
> On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
>> Hi Sinan Akman,
>>
>> Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon.
>> Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon are in user's hands.
>> Because we have also delivery very little board with Rev1.0 silicon to  customer  or developer for developing, assessing and verifying in the early stages.
> 
>    Thanks for the follow up on this, but I don't think that there were only
> very few rev1.0 boards delivered. These were the boards bought from
> distributor and during the time span of many weeks.
> 
>    I don't know the details and the impact of this patch exactly but
> if the patch will break any rev1.0 board I don't think this would be
> acceptable. There are definitely enough number of rev1.0 boards
> made generally available (not specifically for early adapters etc)
> that we should not break u-boot running on them.
> 
>> Also we haven't support Rev1.0 in our SDK now.
> 
>    Sorry, but this is a bit irrelevant here. I'd expect u-boot mainline
> does not necessarily follow what your SDK stops supporting. If
> u-boot supported rev1.0 boards and if there are still many of
>   them out there I see no reason to break this.
> 

Yuan,

Please test the patch on rev 1.0 SoC and make changes if needed. This feature
has been disabled for rev 1.0.

York

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-23  7:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot Yuan Yao
2015-10-14 21:21 ` York Sun
2015-10-15  7:55   ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-15 16:40     ` York Sun
2015-10-15 19:37       ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19  9:21         ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-19 11:14           ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19 15:02             ` York Sun [this message]
2015-10-21  3:59               ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-21  5:37                 ` York Sun
2015-10-30 16:21 ` York Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=562505FD.2060207@freescale.com \
    --to=yorksun@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox