public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/3] arm: discard relocation entries for secure text
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:32:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5644BF12.4000306@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56437573.6080806@denx.de>

On 11/11/2015 18:05, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 02:14, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:14:10PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hello Peng,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:13:03 +0800, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The code such as PSCI in section named secure is bundled with
>>>> u-boot image, and when bootm, the code will be copied to their
>>>> runtime address same to compliation/linking address -
>>>> CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE.
>>>>
>>>> When compile the PSCI code and link it into the u-boot image,
>>>> there will be relocation entries in .rel.dyn section for PSCI.
>>>> Actually, we do not needs these relocation entries.
>>>>
>>>> If still keep the relocation entries in .rel.dyn section,
>>>> r0 at line 103 and 106 in arch/arm/lib/relocate.S may be an invalid
>>>> address which may not support read/write for one SoC.
>>>> 102         /* relative fix: increase location by offset */
>>>> 103         add     r0, r0, r4
>>>> 104         ldr     r1, [r0]
>>>> 105         add     r1, r1, r4
>>>> 106         str     r1, [r0]
>>>>
>>>> So discard them to avoid touching the relocation entry in
>>>> arch/arm/lib/relocate.S.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
>>>> Cc: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
>>>> Cc: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>>>> Cc: Hans De Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>>> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes v4:
>>>>  none
>>>>
>>>> V2 thread: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-October/230755.html
>>>> Changes v3:
>>>>  Move the relocation entries to the very begining and discard them.
>>>>
>>>> V1 thread: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-October/229426.html
>>>> Changes V2:
>>>>  Refine commit msg.
>>>>  Discard the relocation entry section for secure text.
>>>>
>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>> index 03cd9f6..d48a905 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,23 @@ OUTPUT_ARCH(arm)
>>>>  ENTRY(_start)
>>>>  SECTIONS
>>>>  {
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Discard the relocation entries for secure text.
>>>> +	 * The secure code is bundled with u-boot image, so there will
>>>> +	 * be relocations entries for the secure code, since we use
>>>> +	 * "-mword-relocations" to compile and "-pie" to link into the
>>>> +	 * final image. We do not need the relocation entries for secure
>>>> +	 * code, because secure code will not be relocated, it only needs
>>>> +	 * to be copied from loading address to CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE,
>>>> +	 * which is the linking and running address for secure code.
>>>> +	 * If keep the relocation entries in .rel.dyn section,
>>>> +	 * "relocation offset + linking address" may locates into an
>>>> +	 * address that is reserved by SoC, then will trigger data abort.
>>>> +	 *
>>>> +	 * The reason that move .rel._secure at the beginning, is to
>>>> +	 * avoid hole in the final image.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	/DISCARD/ : { *(.rel._secure*) }
>>>>  	. = 0x00000000;
>>>>  
>>>>  	. = ALIGN(4);
>>>> -- 
>>>> 1.8.4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>>
>>
>> Can you please take a look at the patch set and merge?
> 

Applied (whole series) to u-boot-imx, thanks !

Best regards,
Stefano Babic


-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-23  2:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/3] arm: discard relocation entries for secure text Peng Fan
2015-10-23  2:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/3] mx7: psci: add basic psci support Peng Fan
2016-03-31 11:17   ` Gary Bisson
2016-03-31 13:33     ` Peng Fan
2016-03-31 14:21       ` Gary Bisson
2015-10-23  2:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/3] imx: mx7: default enable non-secure mode Peng Fan
2015-10-30  8:23 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/3] arm: discard relocation entries for secure text Peng Fan
2015-11-10 13:01   ` Peng Fan
2015-11-10 13:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2015-11-11  1:14   ` Peng Fan
2015-11-11 17:05     ` Stefano Babic
2015-11-12 16:32       ` Stefano Babic [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-22 13:03 Peng Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5644BF12.4000306@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox