[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 07/12] board: LaCie: Move common headers to board-common directory

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 11/14/2015 05:56 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-13 14:43 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>:
>> Header files can be located in a generic location without
>> needing to reference them with ../common/
>>
>> Generated with the following script
>>
>>  #!/bin/bash
>> vendor=board/LaCie
>> common=$vendor/common
>>
>> cfiles=`git grep "../common" $vendor|grep "#include"|cut -d '"' -f2|sort -u|grep c$`
>> headers=`git grep "../common" $vendor|grep "#include"|cut -d '"' -f2|sort -u|grep h$`
>>
>> mkdir -p $common/include/board-common
>> set -x
>> for header in $headers
>> do
>>         echo "processing $header in $common"
>>         hbase=`basename $header`
>>         git mv $common/$hbase $common/include/board-common
>>         sed -i -e "s/\"..\/common\/$hbase\"/<board-common\/$hbase>/g" $vendor/*/*.[chS]
>>         sed -i -e "s/\"$hbase\"/<board-common\/$hbase>/g" $vendor/common/*.[chS]
>> done
>>
>> Cc: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>
>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> ---
> 
> 
> As far as I understood from 02 to 12,
> the effect of this series is:
> 
> either
>   replace "../common/foo.h" with <board-common/foo.h>
for board/specific board files.

> or
>   replace "bar.h" with <board-common/bar.h>
yes - for board/common headers which are exposed.

> 
> Vendor common headers are referenced within their own directory.
> #include "..." is better than #include <...> in such cases.

Not after this series, which is what is the 3rd change done by this
series: The headers are moved to a common location away from the
board/common directory.

This is more inline with what you did with mach.

> I still do not understand what problem this series wants to solve.

standardize board common header inclusion strategy across boards in a
consistent manner similar to what mach/ changes have been doing.

Overall, you did mention in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/541068/


[step 1] move SoC-specific headers to  arch/<arch>/mach-<soc>/include/mach

[step 2] change  #include <asm/arch/foo.h> to #include <mach/foo.h>



Why did we not let folks user relative includes such as #include
"../../mach/xyz.h" ? because it constraints us from changing the
directory architecture in the future.

This is exactly the same problem that board/<vendor>/ folders have.


Why is it that you dont see that as a problem?


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon