[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: clock: add PMC_PLLICPR init function

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.biessmann@corscience.de>]

Hi Heiko,

On 09.12.2015 08:14, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Wenyou,
> 
> Am 09.12.2015 um 05:36 schrieb Wenyou Yang:
>> To avoid the duplicated code, add the PMC_PLLICPR init function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/armv7/clock.c           |    7 +++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h |    7 +++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/clk.h      |    1 +
>>   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> Sorry for nitpicking, but I just try to applying patches
> from patchwork to u-boot source, compile it and test it
> automated with tbot [1] on the smartweb board [2]
> 
> This patch has also checkpatch errors:
> 
> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,780:  wget
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox
> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,781:  --2015-12-09 08:08:49-- 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox
> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,781:  Resolving patchwork.ozlabs.org
> (patchwork.ozlabs.org)... 103.22.144.67, 2401:3900:2:1::2
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,095:  Connecting to patchwork.ozlabs.org
> (patchwork.ozlabs.org)|103.22.144.67|:80... connected.
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,410:  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301
> MOVED PERMANENTLY
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  Location:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox/ [following]
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  --2015-12-09 08:08:50-- 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox/
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  Reusing existing connection to
> patchwork.ozlabs.org:80.
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  Length: unspecified [text/plain]
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  Saving to: ?mbox?
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  mbox                    [<=>                  
> ]       0  --.-KB/s
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  mbox                    [ <=>                 
> ]   2.34K  --.-KB/s   in 0.001s
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:  2015-12-09 08:08:50 (2.66 MB/s) - ?mbox? saved
> [2397]
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:50] ttbott >
> 2015-12-09 08:08:51,940:  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo 'FAILED'; fi
> 2015-12-09 08:08:51,940:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:51] ttbott >
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,037:  scripts/checkpatch.pl mbox
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,151:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  #47: FILE:
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:251:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  +#define AT91_PMC_ICP_PLLA(x) (((x) & 0x3) <<
> 0)      /* Charge Pump Current PLLA */
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  #48: FILE:
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:252:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  +#define AT91_PMC_IPLL_PLLA(x)        (((x) &
> 0x7) << 8)      /* Engineering Configuration PLLA */
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  #49: FILE:
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:253:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  +#define AT91_PMC_ICP_PLLU(x) (((x) & 0x3) <<
> 16)     /* Charge Pump Current PLL UTMI */
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  #50: FILE:
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:254:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  +#define AT91_PMC_IVCO_PLLU(x)        (((x) &
> 0x3) << 24)     /* Voltage Control Output Current PLL UTMI */
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 checks, 27
> lines checked
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  NOTE: Ignored message types: COMPLEX_MACRO
> CONSIDER_KSTRTO MINMAX MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE
> NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE USLEEP_RANGE
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  mbox has style problems, please review.
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  If any of these errors are false positives,
> please report
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in
> MAINTAINERS.
> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:53] ttbott >
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,283:  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo 'FAILED'; fi
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,283:  FAILED
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,284:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,380:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >cat mbox | grep
> Subject
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,380:  ^[[01;31m^[[KSubject^[[m^[[K: [U-Boot,1/3]
> ARM: at91: clock: add PMC_PLLICPR init function
> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,381:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >
> 

do we really insist on the 'line over 80' rule? Especially when one
describes bit fields which I appreciate. I think it is often hard to
sustain this rule for these cases.

Andreas

> bye,
> Heiko
> [1] https://github.com/hsdenx/tbot
> [2] http://xeidos.ddns.net/buildbot/builders/smartweb_dfu


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20151209/db6859fa/attachment.sig>