[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: clock: add PMC_PLLICPR init function

[Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>]

Hello Andreas,

Am 09.12.2015 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas Bie?mann:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 09.12.2015 08:14, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Wenyou,
>>
>> Am 09.12.2015 um 05:36 schrieb Wenyou Yang:
>>> To avoid the duplicated code, add the PMC_PLLICPR init function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>    arch/arm/mach-at91/armv7/clock.c           |    7 +++++++
>>>    arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h |    7 +++++++
>>>    arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/clk.h      |    1 +
>>>    3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> Sorry for nitpicking, but I just try to applying patches
>> from patchwork to u-boot source, compile it and test it
>> automated with tbot [1] on the smartweb board [2]
>>
>> This patch has also checkpatch errors:
>>
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,780:  wget
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,781:  --2015-12-09 08:08:49--
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:49,781:  Resolving patchwork.ozlabs.org
>> (patchwork.ozlabs.org)... 103.22.144.67, 2401:3900:2:1::2
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,095:  Connecting to patchwork.ozlabs.org
>> (patchwork.ozlabs.org)|103.22.144.67|:80... connected.
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,410:  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301
>> MOVED PERMANENTLY
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  Location:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox/ [following]
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  --2015-12-09 08:08:50--
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554232/mbox/
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,411:  Reusing existing connection to
>> patchwork.ozlabs.org:80.
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  Length: unspecified [text/plain]
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  Saving to: ?mbox?
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  mbox                    [<=>
>> ]       0  --.-KB/s
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,726:  mbox                    [ <=>
>> ]   2.34K  --.-KB/s   in 0.001s
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:  2015-12-09 08:08:50 (2.66 MB/s) - ?mbox? saved
>> [2397]
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:50,727:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:50] ttbott >
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:51,940:  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo 'FAILED'; fi
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:51,940:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:51] ttbott >
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,037:  scripts/checkpatch.pl mbox
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,151:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  #47: FILE:
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:251:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  +#define AT91_PMC_ICP_PLLA(x) (((x) & 0x3) <<
>> 0)      /* Charge Pump Current PLLA */
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  #48: FILE:
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:252:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  +#define AT91_PMC_IPLL_PLLA(x)        (((x) &
>> 0x7) << 8)      /* Engineering Configuration PLLA */
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,152:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  #49: FILE:
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:253:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  +#define AT91_PMC_ICP_PLLU(x) (((x) & 0x3) <<
>> 16)     /* Charge Pump Current PLL UTMI */
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  WARNING: line over 80 characters
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  #50: FILE:
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h:254:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  +#define AT91_PMC_IVCO_PLLU(x)        (((x) &
>> 0x3) << 24)     /* Voltage Control Output Current PLL UTMI */
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 checks, 27
>> lines checked
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:  NOTE: Ignored message types: COMPLEX_MACRO
>> CONSIDER_KSTRTO MINMAX MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE
>> NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE USLEEP_RANGE
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,153:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  mbox has style problems, please review.
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  If any of these errors are false positives,
>> please report
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in
>> MAINTAINERS.
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:53,154:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:53] ttbott >
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,283:  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo 'FAILED'; fi
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,283:  FAILED
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,284:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,380:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >cat mbox | grep
>> Subject
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,380:  ^[[01;31m^[[KSubject^[[m^[[K: [U-Boot,1/3]
>> ARM: at91: clock: add PMC_PLLICPR init function
>> 2015-12-09 08:08:54,381:  hs at pollux [ 8:08:54] ttbott >
>>
>
> do we really insist on the 'line over 80' rule? Especially when one
> describes bit fields which I appreciate. I think it is often hard to
> sustain this rule for these cases.

I think so, yes, but maybe I am wrong?

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany