From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jagan Teki Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:05:13 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: Use mode instead of op_mode_tx In-Reply-To: References: <1450076232-31884-1-git-send-email-jteki@openedev.com> <1450076232-31884-3-git-send-email-jteki@openedev.com> Message-ID: <566E7131.1040300@openedev.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 14 December 2015 01:01 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Used mode member from spi_slave{} instead of op_mode_tx. >> >> Cc: Bin Meng >> Cc: Simon Glass >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki >> --- >> Changes for v2: >> - none >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 2 +- >> drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/spi/ich.c | 2 +- >> include/spi.h | 8 ++------ >> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c >> index 0cafc29..3519ffd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c >> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int spi_flash_std_write(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len, >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SST) >> if (flash->flags & SNOR_F_SST_WR) { >> - if (flash->spi->op_mode_tx & SPI_OPM_TX_BP) >> + if (flash->spi->mode & SPI_TX_BP) > > Did you ever build this? spi->mode is declared as a u8, but SPI_TX_BP is 0x100. Look like I sent the wrong patch, I made mode as uint will send that. thanks! -- Jagan