public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: kbd: don't use int xfers when polling via ctrl xfers
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:45:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5670D05C.8000309@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201512160142.50992.marex@denx.de>

On 12/15/2015 05:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 12:35:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 06:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 09:34:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> When CONFIG_SYS_USB_EVENT_POLL_VIA_CONTROL_EP is enabled, use a
>>>> GET_REPORT control transfer to retrieve the initial state of the
>>>> keyboard. This matches the technique used to poll the keyboard state.
>>>> This is useful since it eliminates the remaining use of interrupt
>>>> transfers from the USB keyboard driver, which allows it to work with
>>>> USB HCD that don't support interrupt transfers.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Are there any disadvantages to using control transfers over interrupt
>>>> transfers? I'm not aware of any, but I assume there must be a reason
>>>> that U-Boot typically uses interrupt transfers.
>>>
>>> I initially implemented the control EP polling because I had a keyboard
>>> which had issues with interrupt transfers.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>
>> Did you intend someone else to apply this?
> 
> Is the discussion concluded already? I was under the impression that there
> was no general agreement.
> 
> Otherwise I can pick this of course.

The last comments in the thread were:

Hans de Goede wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote:
>> However, I think that fixing the existing "use control transfers" support
>> so that it exclusively uses control transfers is still reasonable?
> 
> Ack, as long as we have it, we should fix it. I do believe we should get rid
> of it in the long run though.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-16  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-13 20:34 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: kbd: don't use int xfers when polling via ctrl xfers Stephen Warren
2015-11-14  1:16 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-15 23:35   ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-16  0:42     ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16  2:45       ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-12-16 14:13         ` Marek Vasut
2015-11-15 19:40 ` Hans de Goede
2015-11-16 17:16   ` Stephen Warren
2015-11-16 17:20     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5670D05C.8000309@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox