From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:41:42 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support In-Reply-To: <568AB3F5.9010902@suse.de> References: <1450792676-109541-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20151226153103.GW25034@bivouac.eciton.net> <567EC004.8050709@suse.de> <20151226193450.GC25034@bivouac.eciton.net> <568A9D08.70303@suse.de> <20160104165645.GP4093@bill-the-cat> <568AB3F5.9010902@suse.de> Message-ID: <568ABCE6.8030304@suse.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Am 04.01.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andreas F?rber: > Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: >> Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok >> https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ and >> things Just Work. I setup a bunch of SD cards with Debian and Fedora >> over holiday so I can drop them in whatever board and boot up Linux as a >> sanity test. >> >> I certainly can see a usecase for kicking off an EFI binary as part of >> fitting into existing work-flows. But we do already have a something >> for getting rid of that particular pain-point and it's working :) > [snip] Executive summary: https://xkcd.com/927/ Cheers, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)