[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

[York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>]

On 01/05/2016 10:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, York Sun wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2015 07:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote:
>>> York,
>>>
>>> Just checking if you had seen this patch?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I noticed. You rename P2020RDB to P2020RDB_PC. Do you have another patch
>> using P2020RDB?
> 
> It may be irrelevant. I have a p1020rdb-pb. So technically, unless we
> want to support p2020rdb-pb (which I don't have, and cannot test), you can
> ignore this one.
> 
> I have work here: https://github.com/bhundven/u-boot/tree/p1_p2_rdb-wip
> where I have reverted removing the p1_p2_rdb board, but have started to
> clean up the difference between p1_p2_rdb and p1_p2_rdb_pc. Eventually,
> it makes sense to me to move p1_p2_rdb_pc to p1_p2_rdb, as it has pc,
> and pd. If I can get time to finish, it would have p1020rdb-pb. Then just
> add the small difference for p1011rdb/p1020rdb-pb.
> What are your opinions on that?

I like clean and small changes.

> 
> The things that are difficult right now are:
>  * ddr(2) does not use spd on pb?

If I remember correctly, these boards have fixed DDR. RAW timing method was
introduced to p1_p2_rdb_pc. You are welcome to use this method. It should be
easy to back port.

>  * I have the ltib cds that came with the board, but I still feel like
>    I'm missing a reference manual that is for the pb version. I can find
>    the pc and pd versions of the 1020RM online. pb just seems a little
>    different.

These boards are actually made by third parties. I have P1010RDB on my hand. If
you need P1020RDB, I can find it for you.

York