public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6sxsabresd: support emmc
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:53:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A4D765.2000505@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160124130423.GA21705@linux-7smt.suse>

Hi Peng,

On 24/01/2016 14:04, Peng Fan wrote:

>> I agree with Otavio that this is a very nasty hack, and the hardware
>> developer should provide a way getting the board revision. Anyway, I
>> would not certainly block it, as it concerns just this board, but I ask
>> if it is not better to let decide to an environment variable if eMMC
>> must be activated. Advantage is to have a single U-Boot binary for both
>> boards, disadvantage is that it coul be set for the wrong board
>> revision, too. But if USDHC4 was not used anymore, this drives just to a
>> not found eMMC. Both ways are hacks, I fully agree, but
>> CONFIG_MX6SXSABRESD_EMMC_REWORK remains undocumented at all, too.
>>
>> What do you think ?
> 
> There is no fuse bit or else to let uboot do runtime checking. I also
> disklike this, but I do not have a better idea. Without runtime checking,
> it's hard to use one image support SD/EMMC both. I would like to
> add doc for the macro CONFIG_MX6SXSABRESD_EMMC_REWORK in the next version, do you agree with
> this?

I add Fabio as he is the board maintainer for mx6sxsabresd.

If adding the #ifdef remains the preferred solution instead of checkin
an env variable, it should be done that it does not generate dead code
as the current patch. That means that a defconfig file must be added
into configs, where CONFIG_MX6SXSABRESD_EMMC_REWORK is set. Else the
code is never built by running buildman and breakages cannot be detected.

Anyway, there are already two files for the board,
mx6sxsabresd_defconfig and mx6sxsabresd_spl_defconfig, and if you want
to have for this board revision both U-Boot with and without SPL, two
additional files are needed - it does not scale very well.


Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-24 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22  9:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6sxsabresd: support emmc Peng Fan
2015-12-22 11:51 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-12-23  3:10   ` Peng Fan
2016-01-24 11:07     ` Stefano Babic
2016-01-24 13:04       ` Peng Fan
2016-01-24 13:53         ` Stefano Babic [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A4D765.2000505@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox