From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julian Scheel <julian@jusst.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:40:47 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] tegra124: Add support for Avionic Design
	platform
In-Reply-To: <56CC9BAE.4050207@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1456232346-3968-1-git-send-email-julian@jusst.de>
 <56CC9BAE.4050207@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <56CCB5BF.50503@jusst.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 23.02.16 18:49, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 05:59 AM, Julian Scheel wrote:
>> This adds support for the Avionic Design Tegra124 platform. It
>> consists of the
>> Meerkat SOM and a minimal baseboard Kein Baseboard.
>
>> The as3722 is placed on a different bus as compared to nvidia Jetson,
>> which
>> makes the as3722 required.
>
> This doesn't appear to be quite true. It looks like the AS3722 is on the
> same physical bus, it's just that the I2C aliases in DT assign this bus
> a different number. Typically, all Tegra boards have the PMIC I2C bus as
> U-Boot I2C bus 0. Is there a good reason not to do that here?

You are indeed right. I was so sure about it being a different bus that 
I did not check it at all...
In fact I don't see a real reason not do reorder the i2c to match the 
other platforms. But let me discuss it with Alban before changing.