public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] board:freescale:usb: Remove code duplication for fdt_usb_get_node_type
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:48:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D8329F.7050607@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB4PR04MB0558456F06DAF426208F141CF5BD0@DB4PR04MB0558.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 03/03/2016 12:11 PM, Sriram Dash wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:29 PM
>> To: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Cc: york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Ramneek Mehresh
>> <ramneek.mehresh@nxp.com>; Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] board:freescale:usb: Remove code duplication for
>> fdt_usb_get_node_type
>>
>> On 03/03/2016 09:30 AM, Sriram Dash wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:57 AM
>>>> To: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>>> Cc: york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Ramneek Mehresh
>>>> <ramneek.mehresh@nxp.com>; Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] board:freescale:usb: Remove code
>>>> duplication for fdt_usb_get_node_type
>>>>
>>>> On 03/01/2016 08:03 AM, Sriram Dash wrote:
>>>>> Call fdt_usb_get_node_type() from fdt_fixup_usb_mode_phy_type() to
>>>>> avoid code duplication.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@nxp.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  board/freescale/common/usb.c | 72
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/board/freescale/common/usb.c
>>>>> b/board/freescale/common/usb.c index 85cb1bf..d815dc1 100644
>>>>> --- a/board/freescale/common/usb.c
>>>>> +++ b/board/freescale/common/usb.c
>>>>> @@ -18,33 +18,45 @@
>>>>>  #define CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT 1  #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> -static int fdt_fixup_usb_mode_phy_type(void *blob, const char *mode,
>>>>> -				       const char *phy_type, int start_offset)
>>>>> +static const char *fdt_usb_get_node_type(void *blob, int start_offset,
>>>>> +					 int *node_offset)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	const char *compat_dr = "fsl-usb2-dr";
>>>>>  	const char *compat_mph = "fsl-usb2-mph";
>>>>> -	const char *prop_mode = "dr_mode";
>>>>> -	const char *prop_type = "phy_type";
>>>>>  	const char *node_type = NULL;
>>>>> -	int node_offset;
>>>>> -	int err;
>>>>>
>>>>> -	node_offset = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(blob,
>>>>> -						    start_offset, compat_mph);
>>>>> -	if (node_offset < 0) {
>>>>> -		node_offset = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(blob,
>>>>> -							    start_offset,
>>>>> -							    compat_dr);
>>>>> -		if (node_offset < 0) {
>>>>> -			printf("WARNING: could not find compatible node: %s",
>>>>> -			       fdt_strerror(node_offset));
>>>>> -			return -1;
>>>>> +	*node_offset = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(blob, start_offset,
>>>>> +						     compat_mph);
>>>>> +	if (*node_offset < 0) {
>>>>> +		*node_offset = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(blob,
>>>>> +							     start_offset,
>>>>> +							     compat_dr);
>>>>> +		if (*node_offset < 0) {
>>>>> +			printf("ERROR: could not find compatible node: %s\n",
>>>>> +			       fdt_strerror(*node_offset));
>>>>> +		} else {
>>>>> +			node_type = compat_dr;
>>>>>  		}
>>>>> -		node_type = compat_dr;
>>>>>  	} else {
>>>>>  		node_type = compat_mph;
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>
>>>>> +	return node_type;
>>>>
>>>> The function should be able to return error code. If you need to
>>>> return some more stuff from the function, return it via reference.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This patch is not altering the fdt_usb_get_node_type(). It is only
>>> calling the function from fdt_fixup_usb_mode_phy_type(), to avoid code
>> duplication.
>>
>> I am not complaining about that part. I am complaining about the new function,
>> fdt_usb_get_node_type(), which returns pointer as a return value instead of
>> returning proper error code as a return value.
>>
> 
> I think git diff tool is creating confusion here, I have just moved function fdt_usb_get_node_type
> above fdt_fixup_usb_mode_phy_type which created all the diff and looked as if new function is 
> added. 
> 
> Please check below created patch where declaration is added to call fdt_usb_get_node_type 
> in fdt_usb_get_mode_phy_type. We will be sending below in V4. 
> 
> #################################################################
> 
> diff --git a/board/freescale/common/usb.c b/board/freescale/common/usb.c
> index 85cb1bf..5553225 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/common/usb.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/common/usb.c
> @@ -18,32 +18,21 @@
>  #define CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT 1
>  #endif
>  
> +const char *fdt_usb_get_node_type(void *blob, int start_offset,
> +                                        int *node_offset);
> +

Ah I see, I am wrong, sorry.

btw can you fix the fdt_usb_get_node_type() in another patch to return int ?

Thanks!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01  7:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/3] Make usb device-tree fixup independent of USB controller Sriram Dash
2016-03-01  7:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] board:freescale:common: Move device-tree fixup framework to common file Sriram Dash
2016-03-01 22:13   ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03  8:29     ` Sriram Dash
2016-03-03  9:56       ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03 11:10         ` Sriram Dash
2016-03-03 12:45           ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-01  7:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] board:freescale:usb: Remove code duplication for fdt_usb_get_node_type Sriram Dash
2016-03-01 22:27   ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03  8:30     ` Sriram Dash
2016-03-03  9:59       ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03 11:11         ` Sriram Dash
2016-03-03 12:48           ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2016-03-01  7:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] board:freescale:usb: Add device-tree fixup support for xhci controller Sriram Dash
2016-03-01 22:25   ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03  8:32     ` Sriram Dash
2016-03-03 10:03       ` Marek Vasut
2016-03-03 11:11         ` Sriram Dash

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D8329F.7050607@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox