public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: fix mips_cache fallback without __builtin_mips_cache
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:38:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DC8723.8000402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8206d19176d6fbe7103dcb2fc3bb0ff9dadd3ad4.1457147342.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net>



Am 05.03.2016 um 04:15 schrieb Matthias Schiffer:
> The "R" constraint supplies the address of an variable in a register. Use
> "r" instead and adjust asm to supply the content of addr in a register
> instead.
> 
> Fixes: 2b8bcc5a ("MIPS: avoid .set ISA for cache operations")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> I've noticed this when reading the code to understand how the cache
> instruction is used. I'm not sure if this bug had any practical
> consequences, or if nowadays all relevant compilers have
> __builtin_mips_cache anyways.
> 
> Please keep me in Cc in follow-up mails, I'm not subscribed to the u-boot
> ML.
> 
> Matthias

I've disabled the builtin code and compared dissaemblies with and without your patch. Without your patch, gcc adds an additional store instruction before each cache instruction. 

E.g. for flush_dcache_range():

  18:	afa20008 	sw	v0,8(sp)
  1c:	bfb50008 	cache	0x15,8(sp)

vs.

  14:	bc550000 	cache	0x15,0(v0)

The cache operation works anyway, but with your patch better code is generated.

> 
> 
>  arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> index a3b07c6..002b839 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline void mips_cache(int op, const volatile void *addr)
>  #ifdef __GCC_HAVE_BUILTIN_MIPS_CACHE
>  	__builtin_mips_cache(op, addr);
>  #else
> -	__asm__ __volatile__("cache %0, %1" : : "i"(op), "R"(addr));
> +	__asm__ __volatile__("cache %0, 0(%1)" : : "i"(op), "r"(addr));
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> 

applied to u-boot-mips/next, thanks!

-- 
- Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-06 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-05  3:15 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: fix mips_cache fallback without __builtin_mips_cache Matthias Schiffer
2016-03-06 19:38 ` Daniel Schwierzeck [this message]
2016-03-06 19:53   ` Matthias Schiffer
2016-03-06 20:36     ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2016-03-07  9:30     ` Matthew Fortune

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56DC8723.8000402@gmail.com \
    --to=daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox