From: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: fix mips_cache fallback without __builtin_mips_cache
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:38:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DC8723.8000402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8206d19176d6fbe7103dcb2fc3bb0ff9dadd3ad4.1457147342.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Am 05.03.2016 um 04:15 schrieb Matthias Schiffer:
> The "R" constraint supplies the address of an variable in a register. Use
> "r" instead and adjust asm to supply the content of addr in a register
> instead.
>
> Fixes: 2b8bcc5a ("MIPS: avoid .set ISA for cache operations")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Hi,
> I've noticed this when reading the code to understand how the cache
> instruction is used. I'm not sure if this bug had any practical
> consequences, or if nowadays all relevant compilers have
> __builtin_mips_cache anyways.
>
> Please keep me in Cc in follow-up mails, I'm not subscribed to the u-boot
> ML.
>
> Matthias
I've disabled the builtin code and compared dissaemblies with and without your patch. Without your patch, gcc adds an additional store instruction before each cache instruction.
E.g. for flush_dcache_range():
18: afa20008 sw v0,8(sp)
1c: bfb50008 cache 0x15,8(sp)
vs.
14: bc550000 cache 0x15,0(v0)
The cache operation works anyway, but with your patch better code is generated.
>
>
> arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> index a3b07c6..002b839 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/cacheops.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline void mips_cache(int op, const volatile void *addr)
> #ifdef __GCC_HAVE_BUILTIN_MIPS_CACHE
> __builtin_mips_cache(op, addr);
> #else
> - __asm__ __volatile__("cache %0, %1" : : "i"(op), "R"(addr));
> + __asm__ __volatile__("cache %0, 0(%1)" : : "i"(op), "r"(addr));
> #endif
> }
>
>
applied to u-boot-mips/next, thanks!
--
- Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-06 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-05 3:15 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: fix mips_cache fallback without __builtin_mips_cache Matthias Schiffer
2016-03-06 19:38 ` Daniel Schwierzeck [this message]
2016-03-06 19:53 ` Matthias Schiffer
2016-03-06 20:36 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2016-03-07 9:30 ` Matthew Fortune
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DC8723.8000402@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox