From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for block device cache
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:23:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EB2060.8040309@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458164424-15363-3-git-send-email-eric@nelint.com>
On 03/16/2016 03:40 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>
Patch description.
> ---
> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> drivers/mmc/mmc_write.c | 7 +++++++
Presumably it makes sense for the cache to work for IDE, SATA, USB,
SCSI, ... too. I wonder if it's possible to put this code somewhere more
central than mmc*.c so it automatically applies to
dev_desc->block_read() (see include/part.h). Perhaps not since each
implementation supplies its own block_read function directly, so the
cache calls do need to be duplicated everywhere.
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
> *
> * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> */
> -
> #include <config.h>
Nit: unrelated change.
I think there is a missing call to cache_block_invalidate() when the MMC
device gets re-enumerated/re-initialized. The user would do something to
trigger this (e.g. mmc rescan) when they'd swapped an SD card out for
example.
Do you have any stats on how many operations this saves for typical FS
operations such as:
- Partition table type identification (with various types such as
MBR/DOS, GPT, ...)
- Partition enumeration
- Filesystem identification (with various filesystems such as FAT, ext, ...)
- File reads
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 18:42 [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] simple cache layer for block devices Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] add block device cache Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:16 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-17 21:33 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:41 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:51 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for " Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:23 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2016-03-20 19:35 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:54 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 18:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-26 0:11 ` Eric Nelson
2016-04-09 17:55 ` Simon Glass
2016-04-10 14:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 14:27 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-19 15:42 ` [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Ioan Nicu
2016-03-20 15:02 ` Eric Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EB2060.8040309@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox