From: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ext4 and caching
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 08:02:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EEBB89.7000406@nelint.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160319154227.GB4983@localhost.localdomain>
Thanks Ioan,
On 03/19/2016 08:42 AM, Ioan Nicu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:42:55AM -0700, EXT Eric Nelson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been seeing the same sort of issues repoted by Ionut
>> and as addressed by this patch:
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-January/171459.html
>>
>> That patch was added in commit fc0fc50 and reverted in commit 715b56f.
>>
>> It no longer applies cleanly, and when I tried to resurrect it,
>> I saw errors traversing directories and perhaps something went
>> wrong with my merge.
>>
>> Ionut, do you have a current version of this patch?
>>
>
> We reverted that patch because it was breaking ext4 write support. I initially
> developed the patch on top of an older u-boot which didn't have write supoort
> at all.
>
> I have tried to refactor my patch to work with both read/write, but I gave up
> when I saw that the ext4 write code relied on the old behavior of
> read_allocated_block/ext4fs_get_extent_block. I could have worked around that,
> but then the whole thing would have looked like hack, so I didn't like it ...
>
> If you are interested in a current version of this patch, I could try to
> revive it. But it has the limitation I mentioned above, so I guess you could
> use it just for some ext4 read performance measurement test.
>
I do want to get rid of the performance problem, but as I suggested
by my patch set, I think that a more general-purpose cache is a better
approach.
Regards,
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-20 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 18:42 [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] simple cache layer for block devices Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] add block device cache Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:16 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-17 21:33 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:41 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:51 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for " Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:23 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-20 19:35 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:54 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 18:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-26 0:11 ` Eric Nelson
2016-04-09 17:55 ` Simon Glass
2016-04-10 14:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 14:27 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-19 15:42 ` [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Ioan Nicu
2016-03-20 15:02 ` Eric Nelson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EEBB89.7000406@nelint.com \
--to=eric@nelint.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox