public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY=4 for OlinuXino Lime2
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:51:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EEF128.4020704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EEC18A.1040807@computerlinguist.org>

Hi,

On 20-03-16 16:28, Michael Haas wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 02:45 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19-03-16 14:40, Michael Haas wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2016 10:32 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 19-03-16 09:39, Fran?ois-David Collin wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> As I?m banging my head on this too, please allow me to provide some
>>>>> details
>>>>> I got two stable situations :
>>>>> The Lime2 is connected directly to the Gbit interface of my laptop,
>>>>> speed are OK:
>>>>
>>>> Michael Haas' work to debug this by looking at the phy registers
>>>> seems to be the most promising so-far, the clk reg and axp209
>>>> registers all seem to be identical between good and bad setups.
>>>>
>>>> Can you try to:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Stop the boot in u-boot (press a key on the serial console)
>>>> 2) Bring up the network, e.g. type "dhcp" then ctrl+c when it tries
>>>> to tftp
>>>> 3) Do: "mii read 1 0x11" in u-boot and record the output ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i have diffed and cross-compared logs of several working and broken tftp
>>> downloads. The most significant
>>> difference between working and broken was registers 0xa, 0x1c and 0x2a
>>> in the first MII page.
>>>
>>> These registers started making sense when I looked at the datasheet for
>>> the RTL8211CL. Previously, I was looking at the RTL8211E.
>>>
>>> 0xA was set to 7800 for working runs and 3800 for broken runs. The
>>> difference is bit 14 in the GBSR: 'MASTER/SLAVE Configuration
>>> Resolution'. In the broken runs, the autonegotation configured the
>>> OlinuXino to 'slave'. I have whipped up a quick patch which disable the
>>> master/slave part of the autonegotiation and force master mode.
>>>
>>> The patch itself is quite terrible as it's forcing the master mode bits
>>> for every phy, not just for the RTL8211CL. It's good enough for testing,
>>> however, and I seem to be getting consistent download speeds. There are
>>> occasional hangs when booting the downloaded kernel, but that is
>>> probably a different issue.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> index 51b5746..484b2be 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ int genphy_restart_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>    int genphy_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>    {
>>>           int result;
>>> +       phy_write(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, 0x09, 0x1A00);
>>>
>>>           if (AUTONEG_ENABLE != phydev->autoneg)
>>>                   return genphy_setup_forced(phydev);
>>>
>>> Please test this change and let me know. If it's successful, I will
>>> submit a proper version.
>>
>> Good catch, I wonder why we need this. I believe that the proper version
>> should probably be wrapped in a #ifdef CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY_FORCE_MASTER
>> and then add a Kconfig option for this (and enable it in the lime2
>> defconfig), forcing this on all rtl8211cl phy-s seems wrong, unless
>> someone can dig up an errata from realtek which said we should.
>
> I was going to add that in realtek.c, not in phy.c - as soon as I figure
> out which section there is applicable.

Ack, I already understood that. What I mean is that even if you limit
the fix to just apply to rtl8211cl phys, that that is still a somewhat
big hammer if the problem only happens on the lime2. Always applying
the workaround if the phy is a rtl8211cl means also applying it on
other sunxi boards and likely also on boards with a completely different
soc which also happen to use the rtl8211cl, which is why I suggest that
you wrap it in #ifdef CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY_FORCE_MASTER and a matching
Kconfig bool, which defaults to false.

> I have started a new thread
> asking about that.

Ack I've seen that.

>> Are any other sunxi boards impacted by the same problem that you know ?
>>
>
> No, I don't know of any other boards, but I have not looked very hard :)

Ok, so for now lets put this fix / workaround behind a #ifdef then, and
enable it only on the lime2

Regards,

Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-20 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15  5:41 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY=4 for OlinuXino Lime2 Michael Haas
     [not found] ` <20160315180914.GA1878@excalibur.cnev.de>
2016-03-15 20:41   ` Tom Rini
2016-03-16  8:32   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-16  9:29     ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-16 10:53       ` Hans de Goede
     [not found]       ` <20160316203642.GC1817@excalibur.cnev.de>
2016-03-17  5:28         ` Michael Haas
2016-03-17 10:52           ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-17 21:53             ` Michael Haas
2016-03-18  7:41               ` Hans de Goede
     [not found]                 ` <20160318190220.GC1815@excalibur.cnev.de>
2016-03-18 19:06                   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-20  8:36                     ` Michael Haas
2016-03-20 10:05                       ` François-David Collin
2016-03-18 20:32             ` Michael Haas
2016-03-18 21:53             ` Michael Haas
2016-03-19  8:39               ` François-David Collin
2016-03-19  9:32                 ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-19  9:35                   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-19  9:45                   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-19 13:40                   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-19 14:35                     ` François-David Collin
2016-03-20 13:45                     ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-20 15:28                       ` Michael Haas
2016-03-20 18:51                         ` Hans de Goede [this message]
     [not found]                           ` <20160321154714.GA4751@excalibur.cnev.de>
2016-03-21 18:57                             ` Michael Haas
2016-03-21 20:59                               ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-21 21:01                                 ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-21 21:47                                   ` Michael Haas
2016-03-21 22:00                                     ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-22  5:12                                       ` Michael Haas
2016-03-22  8:46                                 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-03-22  8:57                                   ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-22  9:01                                     ` Michael Haas
2016-03-22  9:50                                     ` Peter Korsgaard
     [not found]                             ` <20160321173000.GD4751@excalibur.cnev.de>
2016-03-21 20:56                               ` Hans de Goede
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-18 17:33 François-David Collin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56EEF128.4020704@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox