From: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for block device cache
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:35:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EEFB99.2080805@nelint.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EB2060.8040309@wwwdotorg.org>
Hi Stephen,
On 03/17/2016 02:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 03:40 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>
>
> Patch description.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/mmc_write.c | 7 +++++++
>
> Presumably it makes sense for the cache to work for IDE, SATA, USB,
> SCSI, ... too. I wonder if it's possible to put this code somewhere more
> central than mmc*.c so it automatically applies to
> dev_desc->block_read() (see include/part.h). Perhaps not since each
> implementation supplies its own block_read function directly, so the
> cache calls do need to be duplicated everywhere.
>
Yeah. I haven't found a spot that would allow interception of
the various block_read/write functions.
The get_dev_hwpart() routine in disk/part.c is close, but it seems
to be bypassed by cmd_mmc, cmd_sata, et cetera.
I think the best that can be done is to provide a common shim that can
easily be inserted from within the various block driver code.
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
>> *
>> * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> */
>> -
>> #include <config.h>
>
> Nit: unrelated change.
>
> I think there is a missing call to cache_block_invalidate() when the MMC
> device gets re-enumerated/re-initialized. The user would do something to
> trigger this (e.g. mmc rescan) when they'd swapped an SD card out for
> example.
>
Good catch.
> Do you have any stats on how many operations this saves for typical FS
> operations such as:
>
> - Partition table type identification (with various types such as
> MBR/DOS, GPT, ...)
> - Partition enumeration
> - Filesystem identification (with various filesystems such as FAT, ext,
> ...)
> - File reads
>
Not yet, but I'm working something up that will allow this to be
gathered easily. As soon as we implement a cache, it provides a nice
spot for tracing operations.
Regards,
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-20 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 18:42 [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] simple cache layer for block devices Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] add block device cache Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:16 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-17 21:33 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:41 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:51 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-16 21:40 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for " Eric Nelson
2016-03-17 21:23 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-20 19:35 ` Eric Nelson [this message]
2016-03-20 22:13 ` Tom Rini
2016-03-20 22:54 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 18:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-26 0:11 ` Eric Nelson
2016-04-09 17:55 ` Simon Glass
2016-04-10 14:31 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-21 14:27 ` Eric Nelson
2016-03-19 15:42 ` [U-Boot] ext4 and caching Ioan Nicu
2016-03-20 15:02 ` Eric Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EEFB99.2080805@nelint.com \
--to=eric@nelint.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox