From: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortmann@web.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] setenv() and variable flags, especially "read-only"
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:24:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FECAD6.6010202@web.de> (raw)
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering what the correct / official way of setting a "read-only"
environment variable is.
It's simple enough to declare some #define CONFIG_ENV_FLAGS_LIST_STATIC
"myvar:sr" to begin with, but this backfires - i.e. prevents write
access - as soon as I try to set a value programmatically via setenv()
(from within U-Boot code). A workaround is to use the "write-once" flag
instead, but this leaves an undesired loop-hole in case "myvar" is
supposed to remain empty/unset - where "write-once" would still allow
the user to set a value interactively.
U-Boot already has a clear distinction between programmatic access via
setenv(), resulting in _do_env_set(..., H_PROGRAMMATIC), and user
interaction (from U-Boot prompt or scripts) ending up as
_do_env_set(..., H_INTERACTIVE). Looking at env_flags_validate() in
env_flags.c I notice that it handles H_FORCE, but doesn't make any use
of H_PROGRAMMATIC.
The second (and more basic) question therefore is: Is programmatic
access from within U-Boot via setenv() supposed to always respect the
flags of variables (when even the user might possibly circumvent them
with "setenv -f" resulting in H_FORCE), or might it be more sensible to
allow all 'internal' setenv() access, disregarding any flags (treating
H_PROGRAMMATIC as "always force")? I'm aware that changing this
behaviour might have broad consequences.
The use case I have in mind is "locking down" (user) access to the fel_*
variables used by sunxi - see
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/sunxi/board.c;h=2d5335f9531c27da59b8b4f9311ccf2a0199859a;hb=HEAD#l568
. The questions/discussion in
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-September/227611.html might
also be relevant.
Regards, B. Nortmann
reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FECAD6.6010202@web.de \
--to=bernhard.nortmann@web.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox