From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] net: designware: fix descriptor layout and warnings on 64-bit archs
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57155711.1000501@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160418213840.GA3707@gmail.com>
On 18.04.16 23:38, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Hmm, this is going to get very interesting with efi_loader support. By
>> default we allocate memory at the highest possible free address, so payloads
>> will probably (unless they specify limits) have their buffers above 32bit on
>> this platform. If we now deny any DMA to them, we basically break I/O
>> access.
>
> I'm not familiar with efi_loader, but on this platform the physical
> RAM is within the 32bit memory range, so I don't think a workaround is
> needed. And I guess probably it's the same for the other 64bit ARM SoC
> using this driver.
So if RAM is always within the lower 32bits, then we don't have a problem.
> BTW, I see that another driver (sunxi_mmc) also truncates the upper 32
> bits of addresses on 64bit platforms. Maybe this issue should be
> addresses in a generic way?
The only 64bit sunxi platform (A64) also only has 32bit physical RAM
addresses.
>> Could you by any chance just use a bounce buffer?
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how to do it? Are there any primitives
> in u-boot to request memory from low addresses?
Thinking about this I don't think we have the memory reservation
logistics to maintain a good bounce buffer. You could create a global
array in bss that you read to / write from, but I'm not sure it's really
worth it.
At the end of the day, if you know that your platform can only ever do
32bit DMA to a physical address range that's only 32bits, it's perfectly
ok IMHO.
We only have a problem if you have a platform that has RAM above 4G and
can only do DMA to 32bit addresses.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 7:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/3] Amlogic Meson GXBaby and ODROID-C2 support Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] net: designware: fix descriptor layout and warnings on 64-bit archs Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 9:56 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-17 11:14 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 20:59 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-18 10:57 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-18 11:06 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-18 21:38 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-18 21:52 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2016-04-25 21:43 ` Joe Hershberger
2016-04-18 11:55 ` Andreas Färber
2016-04-18 22:05 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/3] arm: add initial support for Amlogic Meson and ODROID-C2 Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] arm: meson: implement calls to secure monitor Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 9:48 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-18 21:50 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 10:00 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-18 21:52 ` Beniamino Galvani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57155711.1000501@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox