[U-Boot] [PATCH] travis: turn off dtc unit address warnings

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 04/21/2016 03:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 21 April 2016 at 07:25, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>> On 04/21/2016 03:17 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Marek,
>>>
>>> Am 21.04.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>>> On 04/21/2016 02:48 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>>> suppress a lot of
>>>>> "reg or ranges property, but no unit name" warnings,
>>>>> through the dtc compiler flag "-Wno-unit_address_vs_reg".
>>>>>
>>>>> If all DTS are fixed, we can remove this flag again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> There is also a solution to suppress warnings from
>>>>> the dtc compiler by the "-q" flag, but that would
>>>>> suppress all warnings. Not realy what I want.
>>>>
>>>> Yep
>>>>
>>>>> With this patch and patch:
>>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/609150/
>>>>>
>>>>> travis build passes, see:
>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/hsdenx/u-boot/builds/124723016
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   arch/arc/dts/Makefile        | 2 ++
>>>>>   arch/arm/dts/Makefile        | 3 ++-
>>>>>   arch/microblaze/dts/Makefile | 2 ++
>>>>>   arch/mips/dts/Makefile       | 3 ++-
>>>>>   arch/nios2/dts/Makefile      | 2 ++
>>>>>   arch/powerpc/dts/Makefile    | 2 ++
>>>>>   arch/sandbox/dts/Makefile    | 2 ++
>>>>>   arch/x86/dts/Makefile        | 2 ++
>>>>>   8 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Isn't there some common place in scripts/ or so where we can disable
>>>> this warning using an one-liner ?
>>>
>>> I don;t know ... but I prefer to disable this per arch .. so we can
>>> enable the check back if one arch is fixed ...
>>
>> In my opinion, we should stick to the same behavior Linux does.
>> Ccing a few more people.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to fix the problems?

My impression was that these warnings are just the result of
over-eagerness of DTC, that's why Linux prints them only if you
increase the W= (warning) verbosity. I might be wrong tho.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut