From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:23:36 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/60] ARM: tegra: sort some board file include
 directives
In-Reply-To: <20160425232226.GH29322@bill-the-cat>
References: <1461099580-3866-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
 <1461099580-3866-14-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20160424102050.AD0C110028B@atlas.denx.de> <571E75E2.6020008@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20160425215939.C82CD100386@atlas.denx.de>
 <20160425232226.GH29322@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <571F9608.2050204@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

> Lawyers can argue, but projects have guidelines.  I mean heck, I've see
> you remind people to fix the include order in new patches.  Do they need
> to add an NVIDIA copyright notice too?  No, of course not.

Well honestly all patch review does contribute to the creative process 
and affect the final result, so I don't actually think it'd be that much 
of a stretch that a reviewer's copyright applies to the final patch; 
they were involved in the creation of it. Perhaps Reviewed-by tags or 
the mailing list history would be enough evidence of this though, if 
such were needed later.