From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:00:52 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] usb: Wait after sending Set Configuration
	request
In-Reply-To: <1462355128.1898.18.camel@altera.com>
References: <1462308680-9366-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
 <1462308680-9366-4-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <5729A7BE.9020806@denx.de>
 <1462355128.1898.18.camel@altera.com>
Message-ID: <5729C854.1030307@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04.05.2016 11:45, Chin Liang See wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 09:41 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> On 03.05.2016 22:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Some devices, like the SanDisk Cruzer Pop need some time to process
>>> the Set Configuration request, so wait a little until they are
>>> ready.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>> Cc: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
>>> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>>> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>    common/usb.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
>>> index 63429d4..205041b 100644
>>> --- a/common/usb.c
>>> +++ b/common/usb.c
>>> @@ -1107,6 +1107,14 @@ int usb_select_config(struct usb_device
>>> *dev)
>>>    			"len %d, status %lX\n", dev->act_len, dev
>>> ->status);
>>>    		return err;
>>>    	}
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Wait until the Set Configuration request gets processed
>>> by the
>>> +	 * device. This is required by at least SanDisk Cruzer Pop
>>> USB 2.0
>>> +	 * and Kingston DT Ultimate 32GB USB 3.0 on DWC2 OTG
>>> controller.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	mdelay(10);
>>> +
>>>    	debug("new device strings: Mfr=%d, Product=%d,
>>> SerialNumber=%d\n",
>>>    	      dev->descriptor.iManufacturer, dev
>>> ->descriptor.iProduct,
>>>    	      dev->descriptor.iSerialNumber);
>>>
>>
>> As you might have expected, I'm not a fan of adding new delays to
>> the common USB code. As this negatively affects all platforms. Did
>> you test these two sticks that require this delay on other platforms
>> than SoCFPGA? I would be very interested to know, if these keys are
>> successfully detected without this patch on other platforms. I
>> don't have access to these USB keys, so I can't test it on my
>> platforms.
>>
>
> Actually this series of patches (include the delay) help for all my
> problematic pen drives too. It sound to me these pen drives need time
> to process.

This delay (I'm talking mainly about the 1000ms delay per USB hub
in patch 7/7) does not seem to be necessary on other platforms.

Chin, could you please test again without this patch 7/7 but
with "usb_pgood_delay" set to 1000? And let us know if this
also fixes all the problems with your problematic pen drives?
That would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Stefan