From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 17:22:25 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SPL: FIT: Enable SPL_FIT_LOAD in RAM based
 boot mode
In-Reply-To: <573C8667.10005@ti.com>
References: <8e3d705c04c22e79959554093678775cdd84b4e3.1463504422.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
 <573C8667.10005@ti.com>
Message-ID: <573C88B1.1090001@xilinx.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 18.5.2016 17:12, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/17/2016 10:30 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Support loading FIT in SPL for RAM bootmode.
>> CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADRESS points to address where FIT image is stored
>> in memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Fix empty line
>> - Fix addr name and remove SPL_LOAD_FIT macro
>>
>>   common/spl/spl.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
>> index 0fc5b058be31..3faa751e4b43 100644
>> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
>> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
>> @@ -136,20 +136,47 @@ __weak void __noreturn
>> jump_to_image_no_args(struct spl_image_info *spl_image)
>>       image_entry();
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS
>> +# define CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS    0
>> +#endif
>> +
> 
> May be a good idea to default this to CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE instead of 0?

The problem is that if u-boot is in FIT that it will be loaded to
TEXT_BASE address.
Maybe easier to just don't define any value which end up in compilation
error.

Thanks,
Michal