[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: Move cache sizes to Kconfig

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 05/27/2016 04:34 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/27/2016 12:36 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:10:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/cache.c b/arch/mips/lib/cache.c
>>>>> index 7482005..7695325 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/mips/lib/cache.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/lib/cache.c
>>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>>>>>  #include <asm/cacheops.h>
>>>>>  #include <asm/mipsregs.h>
>>>>>  
>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE
>>>>> +#if CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE != 0
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to introduce something like
>>>> CONFIG_HAVE_CACHE_SUPPORT instead , so you don't need this
>>>> #if CONFIG_FOO != 0 construct all over the place ?
>>>
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> It's not about whether cache support is present (we always build cache
>>> support), it's about whether we are hardcoding the sizes of the caches
>>> or detecting them at runtime. The latter is especially useful on
>>> FPGA-based platforms like Malta where the CPU (& caches) can change. I
>>> suppose I could add something like CONFIG_SYS_CACHE_SIZE_AUTO, but I
>>> still think it would be cleanest to have that default to a value based
>>> upon whether a board has set a non-zero size for any of the caches.
>>
>> Auto-detecting cacheline size is cool, but that'd need much more work.
>> Just grep through drivers/ for CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE and you'll
>> see a lot of code depends on non-zero value in it. Setting it to zero
>> will just bite you at some point in a nasty way.
> 
> Hi Marek,

Hi!

> We're already using the cache size auto-detection on Malta, and on 2
> other FPGA-based boards internally. I've submitted v2 which preserves
> CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE as a synonym of ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN for the
> drivers that are still using it.

That's a good workaround for now. Would you be interested in fixing this
runtime cache configuration properly ?

Off-topic: Is malta that mipsfpga or is that something else ?
Can I synthesise that mipsfpga into some altera FPGA ? If so, which one
is a good pick ?

> Thanks,
>     Paul
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut