From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lokesh Vutla Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:42:42 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, RFC] SPL: FIT: Align loading address for header In-Reply-To: <20160531140911.GE7419@bill-the-cat> References: <20160530175612.GG7419@bill-the-cat> <574D133B.1060608@ti.com> <20160531140911.GE7419@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <574D9BDA.608@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tuesday 31 May 2016 07:39 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:59:47AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> >> >> On Monday 30 May 2016 11:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:36:11AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >>> >>>> If bl_len is not aligned it can caused a problem because another code >>>> expects that start is aligned. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek >>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass >>> >>> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! >> >> This patch is not required and should not be applied. > > Did you both agree on "spl: Allow to load a FIT containing U-Boot from > FS" instead then? And thus what's in the tree needs a little re-work > since I made the above apply on top of this one instead? Sorry/thanks! Yes, Michal as well agreed that this is not required[1]. This patch might work but it can fail in corner cases. If you want I can send a fix patch on top of latest. [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616065/ Thanks and regards, Lokesh >