[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/9] ARMv7: PSCI: update function psci_get_cpu_stack_top

[York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>]

On 06/02/2016 01:07 AM, macro.wave.z at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@nxp.com>
> 
> There are issues of legacy fuction psci_get_cpu_stack_top:
> 
> First, the current algorithm arranges stacks from an fixed adress towards
> psci_text_end, if there are more CPUs, the stacks will overlap with psci text
> segment and even other segments.
> This patch places stacks from psci text segment towards highter address, and
> all the stack space is reserved, so overlap can be avoided.
> 
> Second, even there is one word reserved in each stack for saving target PC, but
> this reserved space isn't used at all, the target PC is still saved to where
> the stack top pointer points.
> This patch doesn't reserve this word as before, new way of saving target PC
> will be introduced in following patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S    | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c |  9 +++++++--
>  arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h  |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S
> index 8e25300..91a1dd1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/psci.S
> @@ -274,16 +274,16 @@ ENDPROC(psci_cpu_off_common)
>  
>  @ expects CPU ID in r0 and returns stack top in r0
>  ENTRY(psci_get_cpu_stack_top)
> -	mov	r5, #0x400			@ 1kB of stack per CPU
> -	mul	r0, r0, r5
> +	mov	r5, #PSCI_PERCPU_STACK_SIZE	@ 1kB of stack per CPU
> +	add	r0, r0, #1
> +	mul	r0, r0, r5			@ offset of each stack
>  
>  	ldr	r5, =psci_text_end		@ end of monitor text
> -	add	r5, r5, #0x2000			@ Skip two pages
> +	add	r5, r5, #0x1000			@ Skip one page
>  	lsr	r5, r5, #12			@ Align to start of page
>  	lsl	r5, r5, #12
> -	sub	r5, r5, #4			@ reserve 1 word for target PC
> -	sub	r0, r5, r0			@ here's our stack!
>  
> +	add	r0, r5, r0			@ here's our stack!
>  	bx	lr
>  ENDPROC(psci_get_cpu_stack_top)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c
> index 5e31891..4fe6f58 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c
> @@ -127,14 +127,19 @@ int armv7_apply_memory_carveout(u64 *start, u64 *size)
>  
>  int psci_update_dt(void *fdt)
>  {
> +	size_t sec_sz = __secure_end - __secure_start;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI
> +	sec_sz += CONFIG_MAX_CPUS * PSCI_PERCPU_STACK_SIZE;
> +	/* margin to align psci_text_end to page end*/
> +	sec_sz += 0x1000;
> +#endif

This causes a compiling error

+(mx7dsabresd) ../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c: In function ?psci_update_dt?:
+(mx7dsabresd) ../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c:132:12: error: ?CONFIG_MAX_CPUS?
undeclared (first use in this function)
+(mx7dsabresd) ../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c:132:12: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

York