From: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Please clarify "merge window"
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:52:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5751EDF8.7060702@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160603204215.GA11619@bill-the-cat>
On 06/03/2016 01:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:10:58PM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>
>> Tom and Wolfgang,
>>
>> Would you please clarify "merge window" again? We have conflicting information
>> regarding if merge window is considered submission window.
>>
>> "After the merge window closes, no new features may be added to allow for a
>> release candidate phase which is intended to fix bugs and regressions." [1]
>>
>> vs
>>
>> "A patch that is generally in good shape and that was submitted while the Merge
>> Window was open is eligible to go into the upcoming release, even if changes and
>> resubmits are needed." [2]
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> York
>>
>> [1] http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle
>> [2] http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/DevelopmentProcess
>
> So, the rule is not iron-clad. This is not the Linux kernel and failure
> to be ready to merge by -rc1 does not mean something cannot go in. But
> by that same token, now that we're down to a 2 month release cycle I
> feel much happier to say No to change that come too late and are too
> invasive. Some big change that's posted in time but then not ready to
> merge until 3 weeks until release is something I'm going to hold off on.
>
Thanks.
York
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 19:10 [U-Boot] Please clarify "merge window" York Sun
2016-06-03 20:42 ` Tom Rini
2016-06-03 20:52 ` York Sun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5751EDF8.7060702@nxp.com \
--to=york.sun@nxp.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox